Maintenance script at 12:40, 8 September 2015

2015-09-08T12:40:54Z

Maintenance script at 04:01, 1 September 2015

2015-09-01T04:01:35Z

New page

<nowiki>*</nowiki>simplex [[Wall, 1965b]], p.308; text-figs.7,20 ex [[Lentin and Williams, 1993]], p.67.  Holotype: [[Wall, 1965b]], text-figs.7,20; [[Eisenack and Kjellström, 1972]], p.187; [[Fensome et al., 1995]], fig.1 - p.1785.  Originally [[Chytroeisphaeridia]] (name not validly published), subsequently (and now) Brigantedinium.  Motile equivalent: Protoperidinium conicoides ([[Paulsen, 1905]]) [[Balech, 1974]], according to [[Harland, 1981|Harland (1981]], p.68).  The species name [[Chytroeisphaeridia simplicia]] was not validly published in [[Wall, 1965b|Wall (1965b]], p.308), since that author did not provide a Latin diagnosis, a requirement since this species is based on living material (I.C.B.N. Article 36.1).  For the same reason, the combination Brigantedinium simplex ([[Wall, 1965b]]) [[Reid, 1977]], p.435 was also not validly published.  Harland and Reid in [[Harland et al., 1980|Harland et al. (1980]], p.222-223) provided a Latin diagnosis, but the name Brigantedinium simplex was still not validly published since the generic name Brigantedinium was not validly published at that time.  [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.67) validly published the generic name Brigantedinium and the species name Brigantedinium simplex by providing a complete citation to both the protologue and a Latin diagnosis.  [[Farr et al., 1986|Farr et al. (1986]], p.18) considered "B. [Brigantedinium] simplex P.C. Reid" to be an illegitimate name since "... cysts of the type species were referred by the author [implying Reid] to an extant species [Protoperidinium conicoides]." As noted by [[Fensome et al., 1995|Fensome et al. (1995]], p.1787), this would only be a possible interpretation if Reid were the validating author.  [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.67), when validating this name, followed [[Reid, 1977|Reid (1977]], p.435) in rendering the epithet as "simplex".  Age: extant.
[[Image:Brigantedinium simplex.jpg]]
[[Category:Taxon]]
[[Category:Species|simplex Brigantedinium]]
[[Category:Type]]
[[Category:MainIndex]]
Parent: [[Parent Genus::Brigantedinium]]
{{#ask:[[Category:Subspecies||Variety||Forma]][[Parent Species::Brigantedinium_simplex]]
|Intro=Infrataxon List: <div class="columns3">
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
|?Category:Questioned#?,
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,
|limit=200
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
|Outro=</div>}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <nowiki>*</nowiki><I><B>simplex</B></I> [[Wall, 1965b]], p.308; text-figs.7,20 ex [[Lentin and Williams, 1993]], p.67.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Wall, 1965b]], text-figs.7,20; [[Eisenack and Kjellstr&#246;m, 1972]], p.187; [[Fensome et al., 1995]], fig.1 - p.1785.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Chytroeisphaeridia]]</I> (name not validly published), subsequently (and now) <I>Brigantedinium</I>.&nbsp; Motile equivalent: <I>Protoperidinium conicoides</I> ([[Paulsen, 1905]]) [[Balech, 1974]], according to [[Harland, 1981|Harland (1981]], p.68).&nbsp; The species name <I>[[Chytroeisphaeridia simplicia]]</I> was not validly published in [[Wall, 1965b|Wall (1965b]], p.308), since that author did not provide a Latin diagnosis, a requirement since this species is based on living material (I.C.B.N. Article 36.1).&nbsp; For the same reason, the combination <I>Brigantedinium simplex</I> ([[Wall, 1965b]]) [[Reid, 1977]], p.435 was also not validly published.&nbsp; Harland and Reid in [[Harland et al., 1980|Harland et al. (1980]], p.222-223) provided a Latin diagnosis, but the name <I>Brigantedinium simplex</I> was still not validly published since the generic name <I>Brigantedinium</I> was not validly published at that time.&nbsp; [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.67) validly published the generic name <I>Brigantedinium</I> and the species name <I>Brigantedinium simplex</I> by providing a complete citation to both the protologue and a Latin diagnosis.&nbsp; [[Farr et al., 1986|Farr et al. (1986]], p.18) considered "<I>B</I>. [<I>Brigantedinium</I>] <I>simplex</I> P.C. Reid" to be an illegitimate name since "... cysts of the type species were referred by the author [implying Reid] to an extant species [<I>Protoperidinium conicoides</I>]."  As noted by [[Fensome et al., 1995|Fensome et al. (1995]], p.1787), this would only be a possible interpretation if Reid were the validating author.&nbsp; [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.67), when validating this name, followed [[Reid, 1977|Reid (1977]], p.435) in rendering the epithet as "<I>simplex</I>".&nbsp; Age: extant.
-[[Image:Brigantedinium simplex.jpg]]
+<CENTER>[[Image:Brigantedinium simplex.jpg]]</CENTER><BR>
 [[Category:Taxon]]
 [[Category:Species|simplex Brigantedinium]]

Brigantedinium simplex - Revision history

Maintenance script at 12:40, 8 September 2015

Maintenance script at 04:01, 1 September 2015