Difference between revisions of "Batioladinium pomum subsp. rude"
From dinoflaj2
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 00:00, 1 September 2015
"subsp. rude" Iosifova, 1992, p.59, pl.10 (not pl.9), figs.4a-b,5. Holotype: Iosifova, 1992, pl.10 (not pl.9), figs.4a-b; Iosifova, 1996, pl.14, fig.5. NOW Batioladinium? gochtii subsp. rude. Originally Batioladinium pomum subsp. rude, subsequently (and now) Batioladinium? gochtii subsp. rude. Age: Ryazanian.Batioladinium pomum
