Difference between revisions of "Hystrichosphaeridium pumile"
From dinoflaj2
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 00:19, 1 September 2015
"pumile" Wetzel, 1933b, p.44, pl.4, fig.24 ex Deflandre, 1937b, p.78. Emendation: Sarjeant, 1985b, p.162, as Diacrocanthidium? pumile. Holotype: Wetzel, 1933b, pl.4, fig.24. NOW Diacrocanthidium? pumile (Appendix A) Originally Hystrichosphaera longispinosa forma pumilis (name not validly published), subsequently Hystrichosphaeridium pumile, thirdly Baltisphaeridium pumile (combination not validly published; Appendix A), fourthly Micrhystridium pumile (Appendix A), fifthly (and now) Diacrocanthidium? pumile (Appendix A). The name Hystrichosphaera longispinosa forma pumilis was not validly published in Wetzel (1933b), since the species name Hystrichosphaera longispinosa was not validly published. Age: Late Cretaceous (erratic).
Parent: Hystrichosphaeridium
