Brigantedinium simplex - Revision history

Maintenance script at 18:15, 30 December 2016

2016-12-30T18:15:17Z

Maintenance script at 23:06, 21 December 2016

2016-12-21T23:06:25Z

Maintenance script at 21:33, 5 December 2016

2016-12-05T21:33:42Z

Maintenance script at 19:36, 4 December 2016

2016-12-04T19:36:38Z

Maintenance script at 17:34, 3 December 2016

2016-12-03T17:34:52Z

Maintenance script at 17:20, 2 December 2016

2016-12-02T17:20:00Z

New page

<nowiki>*</nowiki>simplex [[Wall, 1965b]], p.308; text-figs.7,20 ex [[Lentin and Williams, 1993]], p.67.  Holotype: [[Wall, 1965b]], text-figs.7,20; [[Eisenack and Kjellström, 1972]], p.187; [[Fensome et al., 1995]], fig.1 - p.1785.  Originally [[Chytroeisphaeridia]] (name not validly published), subsequently (and now) Brigantedinium.  Motile equivalent: Protoperidinium conicoides ([[Paulsen, 1905]]) [[Balech, 1974]], according to [[Harland, 1981|Harland (1981]], p.68).  The species name [[Chytroeisphaeridia simplicia]] was not validly published in [[Wall, 1965b|Wall (1965b]], p.308), since that author did not provide a Latin diagnosis, a requirement since this species is based on living material (I.C.N. Article 39).  For the same reason, the combination Brigantedinium simplex ([[Wall, 1965b]]) [[Reid, 1977]], p.435 was also not validly published.  Harland and Reid in [[Harland et al., 1980|Harland et al. (1980]], p.222-223) provided a Latin diagnosis, but the name Brigantedinium simplex was still not validly published since the generic name Brigantedinium was not validly published at that time.  [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.67) validly published the generic name Brigantedinium and the species name Brigantedinium simplex by providing a complete citation to both the protologue and a Latin diagnosis.  [[Farr et al., 1986|Farr et al. (1986]], p.18) considered "B. [Brigantedinium] simplex P.C. Reid" to be an illegitimate name since "... cysts of the type species were referred by the author [implying Reid] to an extant species [Protoperidinium conicoides]." As noted by [[Fensome et al., 1995|Fensome et al. (1995]], p.1787), this would only be a possible interpretation if Reid were the validating author.  [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.67), when validating this name, followed [[Reid, 1977|Reid (1977]], p.435) in rendering the epithet as "simplex".  Age: extant.
[[Category:Index2016]]

 <CENTER><CENTER>[[Image:Brigantedinium_simplex.jpg]]</CENTER> </CENTER>
[[Category:Taxon]]
[[Category:Species|simplex Brigantedinium]]
[[Category:Type]]
[[Category:MainIndex]]
Parent: [[Parent Genus::Brigantedinium]]
{{#ask:[[Category:Subspecies||Variety||Forma]][[Parent Species::Brigantedinium_simplex]]
|Intro=Infrataxon List: <div class="columns3">
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
|?Category:Questioned#?,
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,
|limit=200
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
|Outro=</div>}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <nowiki>*</nowiki><B><I>simplex</I></B> [[Wall, 1965b]], p.308; text-figs.7,20 ex [[Lentin and Williams, 1993]], p.67.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Wall, 1965b]], text-figs.7,20; [[Eisenack and Kjellstr&#246;m, 1972]], p.187; [[Fensome et al., 1995]], fig.1 &mdash; p.1785.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Chytroeisphaeridia]]</I> (name not validly published), subsequently (and now) <I>Brigantedinium</I>.&nbsp; Motile equivalent: <I>Protoperidinium conicoides</I> ([[Paulsen, 1905]]) [[Balech, 1974]], according to [[Harland, 1981|Harland (1981]], p.68).&nbsp; The species name <I>[[Chytroeisphaeridia simplicia]]</I> was not validly published in [[Wall, 1965b|Wall (1965b]], p.308), since that author did not provide a Latin diagnosis, a requirement since this species is based on living material (I.C.N. Article 39).&nbsp; For the same reason, the combination <I>Brigantedinium simplex</I> ([[Wall, 1965b]]) [[Reid, 1977]], p.435 was also not validly published.&nbsp; Harland and Reid in [[Harland et al., 1980|Harland et al. (1980]], p.222&ndash;223) provided a Latin diagnosis, but the name <I>Brigantedinium simplex</I> was still not validly published since the generic name <I>Brigantedinium</I> was not validly published at that time.&nbsp; [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.67) validly published the generic name <I>Brigantedinium</I> and the species name <I>Brigantedinium simplex</I> by providing a complete citation to both the protologue and a Latin diagnosis.&nbsp; [[Farr et al., 1986|Farr et al. (1986]], p.18) considered "<I>B</I>. [<I>Brigantedinium</I>] <I>simplex</I> P.C. Reid" to be an illegitimate name since "... cysts of the type species were referred by the author [implying Reid] to an extant species [<I>Protoperidinium conicoides</I>]."  As noted by [[Fensome et al., 1995|Fensome et al. (1995]], p.1787), this would only be a possible interpretation if Reid were the validating author.&nbsp; [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.67), when validating this name, followed [[Reid, 1977|Reid (1977]], p.435) in rendering the epithet as "<I>simplex</I>".&nbsp; Age: extant.
 [[Category:Index2016]]
 <BR><CENTER>[[Image:Brigantedinium_simplex.jpg|link=]]</CENTER>

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 21 December 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	<nowiki>*</nowiki><B><I>simplex</I></B> [[Wall, 1965b]], p.308; text-figs.7,20 ex [[Lentin and Williams, 1993]], p.67.  Holotype: [[Wall, 1965b]], text-figs.7,20; [[Eisenack and Kjellström, 1972]], p.187; [[Fensome et al., 1995]], fig.1 - p.1785.  Originally <I>[[Chytroeisphaeridia]]</I> (name not validly published), subsequently (and now) <I>Brigantedinium</I>.  Motile equivalent: <I>Protoperidinium conicoides</I> ([[Paulsen, 1905]]) [[Balech, 1974]], according to [[Harland, 1981\|Harland (1981]], p.68).  The species name <I>[[Chytroeisphaeridia simplicia]]</I> was not validly published in [[Wall, 1965b\|Wall (1965b]], p.308), since that author did not provide a Latin diagnosis, a requirement since this species is based on living material (I.C.N. Article 39).  For the same reason, the combination <I>Brigantedinium simplex</I> ([[Wall, 1965b]]) [[Reid, 1977]], p.435 was also not validly published.  Harland and Reid in [[Harland et al., 1980\|Harland et al. (1980]], p.222-223) provided a Latin diagnosis, but the name <I>Brigantedinium simplex</I> was still not validly published since the generic name <I>Brigantedinium</I> was not validly published at that time.  [[Lentin and Williams, 1993\|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.67) validly published the generic name <I>Brigantedinium</I> and the species name <I>Brigantedinium simplex</I> by providing a complete citation to both the protologue and a Latin diagnosis.  [[Farr et al., 1986\|Farr et al. (1986]], p.18) considered "<I>B</I>. [<I>Brigantedinium</I>] <I>simplex</I> P.C. Reid" to be an illegitimate name since "... cysts of the type species were referred by the author [implying Reid] to an extant species [<I>Protoperidinium conicoides</I>]." As noted by [[Fensome et al., 1995\|Fensome et al. (1995]], p.1787), this would only be a possible interpretation if Reid were the validating author.  [[Lentin and Williams, 1993\|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.67), when validating this name, followed [[Reid, 1977\|Reid (1977]], p.435) in rendering the epithet as "<I>simplex</I>".  Age: extant.	+	<nowiki>*</nowiki><B><I>simplex</I></B> [[Wall, 1965b]], p.308; text-figs.7,20 ex [[Lentin and Williams, 1993]], p.67.  Holotype: [[Wall, 1965b]], text-figs.7,20; [[Eisenack and Kjellström, 1972]], p.187; [[Fensome et al., 1995]], fig.1 — p.1785.  Originally <I>[[Chytroeisphaeridia]]</I> (name not validly published), subsequently (and now) <I>Brigantedinium</I>.  Motile equivalent: <I>Protoperidinium conicoides</I> ([[Paulsen, 1905]]) [[Balech, 1974]], according to [[Harland, 1981\|Harland (1981]], p.68).  The species name <I>[[Chytroeisphaeridia simplicia]]</I> was not validly published in [[Wall, 1965b\|Wall (1965b]], p.308), since that author did not provide a Latin diagnosis, a requirement since this species is based on living material (I.C.N. Article 39).  For the same reason, the combination <I>Brigantedinium simplex</I> ([[Wall, 1965b]]) [[Reid, 1977]], p.435 was also not validly published.  Harland and Reid in [[Harland et al., 1980\|Harland et al. (1980]], p.222–223) provided a Latin diagnosis, but the name <I>Brigantedinium simplex</I> was still not validly published since the generic name <I>Brigantedinium</I> was not validly published at that time.  [[Lentin and Williams, 1993\|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.67) validly published the generic name <I>Brigantedinium</I> and the species name <I>Brigantedinium simplex</I> by providing a complete citation to both the protologue and a Latin diagnosis.  [[Farr et al., 1986\|Farr et al. (1986]], p.18) considered "<I>B</I>. [<I>Brigantedinium</I>] <I>simplex</I> P.C. Reid" to be an illegitimate name since "... cysts of the type species were referred by the author [implying Reid] to an extant species [<I>Protoperidinium conicoides</I>]." As noted by [[Fensome et al., 1995\|Fensome et al. (1995]], p.1787), this would only be a possible interpretation if Reid were the validating author.  [[Lentin and Williams, 1993\|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.67), when validating this name, followed [[Reid, 1977\|Reid (1977]], p.435) in rendering the epithet as "<I>simplex</I>".  Age: extant.
	[[Category:Index2016]]		[[Category:Index2016]]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 [[Category:Index2016]]
-<BR><CENTER>[[Image:Brigantedinium_simplex.jpg]]</CENTER>
+<BR><CENTER>[[Image:Brigantedinium_simplex.jpg|link=]]</CENTER>
 [[Category:Taxon]]
 [[Category:Species|simplex Brigantedinium]]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,
 |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,
-|limit=200
+|limit=400
 |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest
 |?Category:Quoted#",'''
 |Outro=</div>}}