DRAWING FORMAT - Revision history

Dinoadmin at 22:24, 9 January 2017

2017-01-09T22:24:37Z

Dinoadmin at 22:24, 9 January 2017

2017-01-09T22:24:05Z

Dinoadmin at 04:00, 3 January 2017

2017-01-03T04:00:03Z

Dinoadmin at 03:55, 3 January 2017

2017-01-03T03:55:42Z

Dinoadmin at 03:52, 3 January 2017

2017-01-03T03:52:33Z

Dinoadmin at 00:44, 3 January 2017

2017-01-03T00:44:54Z

Dinoadmin at 00:34, 3 January 2017

2017-01-03T00:34:36Z

Dinoadmin at 00:33, 3 January 2017

2017-01-03T00:33:53Z

Dinoadmin at 00:33, 3 January 2017

2017-01-03T00:33:27Z

Dinoadmin at 00:31, 3 January 2017

2017-01-03T00:31:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 9 January 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	We are looking for simple line drawings of fossil dinoflagellates that do not yet have images in the current version of DINOFLAJ3. ~~Completing representative~~ drawings for the <B>"currently correct"</B> ~~genera is a priority~~. These should be <I>vector</I> drawings generated using programs such as Adobe Illustrator or CorelDraw, not scanned bitmap images or photographs of specimens. The current drawings in DINOFLAJ3 are not perfect. We are open to modified or emended versions. For a good example of the style, refer to [[Stover and Williams, 1987\|Stover and Williams (1987]]).	+	We are looking for simple line drawings of fossil dinoflagellates that do not yet have images in the current version of DINOFLAJ3. Representative drawings for the remaining <B>"currently correct" genera are a priority</B>. These should be <I>vector</I> drawings generated using programs such as Adobe Illustrator or CorelDraw, not scanned bitmap images or photographs of specimens. The current drawings in DINOFLAJ3 are not perfect. We are open to modified or emended versions. For a good example of the style, refer to [[Stover and Williams, 1987\|Stover and Williams (1987]]).

	Drawings should be simplified to show the relevant features of the taxon in an idealized form, possibly from more than one orientation. Opercula can be present or not, but it is preferred that an archeopyle be indicated somehow. The linework and shading should consist of:		Drawings should be simplified to show the relevant features of the taxon in an idealized form, possibly from more than one orientation. Opercula can be present or not, but it is preferred that an archeopyle be indicated somehow. The linework and shading should consist of:

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 9 January 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	We are looking for simple line drawings of fossil dinoflagellates that do not yet have images in the current version of DINOFLAJ3. Completing representative drawings for the "currently correct" genera is a priority. These should be <I>vector</I> drawings generated using programs such as Adobe Illustrator or CorelDraw, not scanned bitmap images or photographs of specimens. The current drawings in DINOFLAJ3 are not perfect. We are open to modified or emended versions. For a good example of the style, refer to [[Stover and Williams, 1987\|Stover and Williams (1987]]).	+	We are looking for simple line drawings of fossil dinoflagellates that do not yet have images in the current version of DINOFLAJ3. Completing representative drawings for the <B>"currently correct"</B> genera is a priority. These should be <I>vector</I> drawings generated using programs such as Adobe Illustrator or CorelDraw, not scanned bitmap images or photographs of specimens. The current drawings in DINOFLAJ3 are not perfect. We are open to modified or emended versions. For a good example of the style, refer to [[Stover and Williams, 1987\|Stover and Williams (1987]]).

	Drawings should be simplified to show the relevant features of the taxon in an idealized form, possibly from more than one orientation. Opercula can be present or not, but it is preferred that an archeopyle be indicated somehow. The linework and shading should consist of:		Drawings should be simplified to show the relevant features of the taxon in an idealized form, possibly from more than one orientation. Opercula can be present or not, but it is preferred that an archeopyle be indicated somehow. The linework and shading should consist of:

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-We are looking for simple line drawings of fossil dinoflagellates that do not yet have images in the current version of DINOFLAJ3.  These should be vector drawings generated using programs such as Adobe Illustrator or CorelDraw, not scanned images or photographs of specimens.  The current drawings in DINOFLAJ3 are not perfect.  We are open to modified or emended versions.  For a good example of the style, refer to [[Stover and Williams, 1987|Stover and Williams (1987]]).
+We are looking for simple line drawings of fossil dinoflagellates that do not yet have images in the current version of DINOFLAJ3.  Completing representative drawings for the "currently correct" genera is a priority.  These should be <I>vector</I> drawings generated using programs such as Adobe Illustrator or CorelDraw, not scanned bitmap images or photographs of specimens.  The current drawings in DINOFLAJ3 are not perfect.  We are open to modified or emended versions.  For a good example of the style, refer to [[Stover and Williams, 1987|Stover and Williams (1987]]).
 Drawings should be simplified to show the relevant features of the taxon in an idealized form, possibly from more than one orientation.  Opercula can be present or not, but it is preferred that an archeopyle be indicated somehow.  The linework and shading should consist of:
@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 [[Image:Cordosphaeridium_cantharellus.jpg]] <I>[[Cordosphaeridium cantharellus]]</I>
-Admittedly we sometimes break these suggestions ourselves due to the various vintages and sources, but we will try to fix them over time.  This is why having a vector diagram for further modification is so important.
+Admittedly we sometimes break these style suggestions ourselves due to the various vintages and sources of the drawings, but we will try to fix them over time.  This is why having a vector diagram for further modification is so important.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:55, 3 January 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:

	[[Image:Cordosphaeridium_cantharellus.jpg]] <I>[[Cordosphaeridium cantharellus]]</I>		[[Image:Cordosphaeridium_cantharellus.jpg]] <I>[[Cordosphaeridium cantharellus]]</I>
		+
		+	Admittedly we sometimes break these suggestions ourselves due to the various vintages and sources, but we will try to fix them over time. This is why having a vector diagram for further modification is so important.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:52, 3 January 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	We are looking for simple line drawings of fossil dinoflagellates that do not yet have images in the current version of DINOFLAJ3. These should be vector drawings generated using programs such as Adobe Illustrator or CorelDraw, not scanned images or photographs of specimens. For a good example of the style, refer to [[Stover and Williams, 1987\|Stover and Williams (1987]])~~. The current drawings in DINOFLAJ3 are not perfect. We are open to modified or emended versions~~.	+	We are looking for simple line drawings of fossil dinoflagellates that do not yet have images in the current version of DINOFLAJ3. These should be vector drawings generated using programs such as Adobe Illustrator or CorelDraw, not scanned images or photographs of specimens. The current drawings in DINOFLAJ3 are not perfect. We are open to modified or emended versions. For a good example of the style, refer to [[Stover and Williams, 1987\|Stover and Williams (1987]]).

	Drawings should be simplified to show the relevant features of the taxon in an idealized form, possibly from more than one orientation. Opercula can be present or not, but it is preferred that an archeopyle be indicated somehow. The linework and shading should consist of:		Drawings should be simplified to show the relevant features of the taxon in an idealized form, possibly from more than one orientation. Opercula can be present or not, but it is preferred that an archeopyle be indicated somehow. The linework and shading should consist of:

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:44, 3 January 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	We are looking for simple line drawings of fossil dinoflagellates that do not yet have images in the current version of DINOFLAJ3. These should be vector drawings generated using programs such as Adobe Illustrator or CorelDraw, not scanned images or photographs of specimens. For a good example of the style, refer to [[Stover and Williams, 1987\|Stover and Williams (1987]]).	+	We are looking for simple line drawings of fossil dinoflagellates that do not yet have images in the current version of DINOFLAJ3. These should be vector drawings generated using programs such as Adobe Illustrator or CorelDraw, not scanned images or photographs of specimens. For a good example of the style, refer to [[Stover and Williams, 1987\|Stover and Williams (1987]]). The current drawings in DINOFLAJ3 are not perfect. We are open to modified or emended versions.

	Drawings should be simplified to show the relevant features of the taxon in an idealized form, possibly from more than one orientation. Opercula can be present or not, but it is preferred that an archeopyle be indicated somehow. The linework and shading should consist of:		Drawings should be simplified to show the relevant features of the taxon in an idealized form, possibly from more than one orientation. Opercula can be present or not, but it is preferred that an archeopyle be indicated somehow. The linework and shading should consist of:

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 [[Image:Cerbia_A.jpg]][[Image:Cerbia_B.jpg]] <I>[[Cerbia]]</I>
 [[Image:Discorsia.jpg]] <I>[[Discorsia]]</I>
 [[Image:Cordosphaeridium_cantharellus.jpg]] <I>[[Cordosphaeridium cantharellus]]</I>

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 3 January 2017
Line 19:		Line 19:
	[[Image:Discorsia.jpg]] <I>[[Discorsia]]</I>		[[Image:Discorsia.jpg]] <I>[[Discorsia]]</I>

−	[[Image:Cordosphaeridium_cantharellus]] <I>[[Cordosphaeridium cantharellus]]</I>	+	[[Image:Cordosphaeridium_cantharellus.jpg]] <I>[[Cordosphaeridium cantharellus]]</I>

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 #insets or separate drawings can show details too small to show on the main diagram (e.g., ornamentation)
 #if tabulation is indicated with labels, they should use a sans-serif font such as Helvetica or Arial
 Refer to the following images for examples: