Difference between revisions of "Tenua simlaensis"
From dinoflaj3
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 14:08, 2 December 2016
"simlaensis" Khanna and Singh, 1981b, p.390, fig.1, nos.8-9; text-fig.2. Holotype: Khanna and Singh, 1981b, fig.1, no.8. NOW Batiacasphaera?. Originally Tenua Eisenack, subsequently (and now) Batiacasphaera?. This name was not validly published in Khanna (1979, p.216) and Singh et al. (1979, p.35-36) since no description was provided. Age: Early Eocene.
Parent: Tenua_Eisenack 1958a