Difference between revisions of "Batiacasphaera simlaensis"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 15:35, 4 December 2016

?simlaensis (Khanna and Singh, 1981b, p.389-390, fig.1, nos.8-9; text-fig.2) Lentin and Williams, 1993, p.56.  Holotype: Khanna and Singh, 1981b, fig.1, no.8.  Originally Tenua Eisenack, subsequently (and now) Batiacasphaera?.  Questionable assignment: Lentin and Williams (1993, p.56).  This name was not validly published in Khanna (1979, p.216) and Singh et al. (1979, p.35-36) since no description was provided.  Age: Early Eocene.

Parent: Batiacasphaera