Difference between revisions of "Bicarinellum pulchrum"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Revision as of 15:35, 4 December 2016
pulchrum Keupp and Kowalski, 1992, p.221, pl.5, fig.13; pl.6, figs.1-2,4. Holotype: Keupp and Kowalski, 1992, pl.6, fig.1. Keupp and Kowalski (1992, p.221) placed the generic name in quotes. The Latin adjective "pulcher" (masculine) is declined as "pulchra" (feminine) and "pulchrum" (neuter). Age: mid to late Albian.
Parent: Bicarinellum