Difference between revisions of "Cleistosphaeridium tribuliferum"
From dinoflaj3
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
− | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} |
Revision as of 15:41, 4 December 2016
"?tribuliferum" (Sarjeant, 1962a, p.487-488, pl.70, fig.4; text-figs.6c,7) Davey et al., 1969, p.16. Holotype: Sarjeant, 1962a, pl.70, fig.4; Fauconnier and Masure, 2004, pl.23, fig.11. NOW Downiesphaeridium. Originally Baltisphaeridium (Appendix A), subsequently Cleistosphaeridium, thirdly Cleistosphaeridium?, fourthly Impletosphaeridium, fifthly (and now) Downiesphaeridium. Questionable assignment: Stover and Evitt (1978, p.32). This combination was not validly published in Davey et al. (1966, p.170), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: Oxfordian.
Parent: Cleistosphaeridium