Difference between revisions of "Hystrichodinium amphiacanthum"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 14: Line 14:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 16:54, 4 December 2016

"?amphiacanthum" Cookson and Eisenack, 1958, p.37, pl.5, fig.9.  Holotype: Cookson and Eisenack, 1958, pl.5, fig.9; Fensome et al., 1993a, fig.1 - p.911.  NOW Omatidium.  Originally Hystrichodinium, subsequently Hystrichodinium?, thirdly (and now) Omatidium.  Questionable assignment: Stover and Evitt (1978, p.161-162).  Age: Late Jurassic or Neocomian.

Parent: Hystrichodinium