Difference between revisions of "Litosphaeridium crassipes"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 14: Line 14:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 16:03, 4 December 2016

"?crassipes" (Reade, 1839, pl.9, figs.2-5) Davey and Williams, 1969, p.5.  Emendation: Lejeune-Carpentier and Sarjeant, 1981, p.10, as Hystrichokolpoma? crassipes.  Holotype: Reade, 1839, pl.9, fig.2, lost according to Lejeune-Carpentier and Sarjeant (1981, p.11).  Neotype: Lejeune-Carpentier, 1941, fig.9; Lejeune-Carpentier and Sarjeant, 1981, pl.3, fig.3; text-fig.6; designated by Lejeune-Carpentier and Sarjeant (1981, p.11).  NOW Hystrichokolpoma.  Originally Xanthidium (Appendix A), subsequently Hystrichosphaeridium, thirdly Litosphaeridium?, fourthly (and now) Hystrichokolpoma.  Questionable assignment: Davey and Williams (1969, p.5).  Taxonomic junior synonym: Hystrichosphaeridium (as Pervosphaeridium) truncigerum, by implication in Yun Hyesu (1981, p.27), who considered Hystrichosphaeridium (as Pervosphaeridium) truncigerum to be the senior name - however, Lentin and Williams (1985, p.282) retained Pervosphaeridium truncigerum.  This combination, as a questionable assignment, was not validly published in Davey and Williams (1966b, p.83), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym.  Age: Late Cretaceous.

Parent: Litosphaeridium