Difference between revisions of "Nematosphaeropsis elegantula"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:07, 4 December 2016
"elegantula" (Drugg, 1967, p.25, pl.4, fig.17) Stover and Williams, 1987, p.217. Holotype: Drugg, 1967, pl.4, fig.17. NOW Trabeculidium. Originally Cannosphaeropsis, subsequently Cannosphaeropsis?, thirdly (and now) Trabeculidium, fourthly Nematosphaeropsis. Jan du Chêne (1988, p.162) also proposed this combination. Age: Danian.
Parent: Nematosphaeropsis