Difference between revisions of "Operculodinium pontis"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 14: Line 14:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 17:09, 4 December 2016

"?pontis" Zevenboom and Santarelli in Zevenboom, 1995, p.139, pl.6, figs.11-14.  Holotype: Zevenboom, 1995, pl.6, figs.11-14.  Name not validly published: considered a manuscript name.  Questionable assignment: Zevenboom and Santarelli in Zevenboom (1995, p.139).  Taxonomic senior synonym: Operculodinium tegillatum; Louwye (1999, p.115) considered Operculodinium? pontis to be a taxonomic junior synonym of Operculodinium antwerpense, which is now considered a taxonomic junior synonym of Operculodinium tegillatum.  N.I.A.  Age: ?Late Miocene-Pliocene.

Parent: Operculodinium