Difference between revisions of "Palaeoperidinium velatum"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Revision as of 17:11, 4 December 2016
"?velatum" Conrad, 1941, p.8-9, pl.1, fig.A. Holotype: Conrad, 1941, pl.1, fig.A. Name not validly published: generic name not validly published until 1967. NOW Trithyrodinium?. Originally Palaeoperidinium (name not validly published), subsequently Scriniodinium?, thirdly Palaeoperidinium? (combination not validly published), fourthly (and now) Trithyrodinium?. Questionable assignment: Stover and Evitt (1978, p.218) as a problematic species. This combination was not validly published in Stover and Evitt (1978, p.218) since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: Maastrichtian.
Parent: Palaeoperidinium