Difference between revisions of "Sentusidinium bifidum"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Revision as of 17:20, 4 December 2016
?bifidum (Jiabo, 1978, p.51-52, pl.22, figs.7-16) He Chengquan, Zhu Shenzhao and Jin Guangxing in He Chengquan et al., 1989, p.66-67, pl.16, figs.17-23. Holotype: Jiabo, 1978, pl.22, fig.8. Originally Tenua Eisenack, subsequently Cleistosphaeridium?, thirdly (and now) Sentusidinium. Questionable assignment: Xu Jinli et al. (1997, p.46); and Courtinat in Fauconnier and Masure (2004, p.486) as a problematic species. Islam (1993, p.87) also proposed this combination. Age: Early Tertiary.
Parent: Sentusidinium