Difference between revisions of "Baltisphaeridium multipilosum Appendix A"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 12: Line 12:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Revision as of 16:30, 4 December 2016

multipilosum (Eisenack, 1931, p.111, pl.5, figs.20-22 ex Eisenack, 1938a, p.12) Eisenack, 1959, p.197.  Holotype: Eisenack, 1931, pl.5, fig.22, as Ovum hispidum subsp. multipilosum, lost according to Eisenack (1959, p.197).  Neotype: Eisenack, 1959, pl.15, fig.11, designated by Eisenack (1959, p.197).  Originally Ovum hispidum subsp. multipilosum (name not validly published, Appendix A), subsequently Hystrichosphaeridium multipilosum, thirdly (and now) Baltisphaeridium multipilosum.  This combination was not validly published in Eisenack (1958b, p.400), since that author did not fully reference the basionym.  The name Ovum hispidum subsp. multipilosum was not validly published in Eisenack (1931) since the specific name Ovum hispidum was not validly published.  Age: Silurian.

Parent: Baltisphaeridium_Appendix A

Infrataxon List: