Difference between revisions of "Cordosphaeridium gracile forma areolatum"
From dinoflaj3
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | forma <B><I>areolatum</I></B> ([[Eisenack, 1954b]], p.67, pl.12, fig.21) Williams and Fensome, 2016, p.140. Holotype: [[Eisenack, 1954b]], p.67, pl.12, fig.21. Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium inodes subsp. gracile|Hystrichosphaeridium inodes]]</I> subsp. <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium inodes subsp. gracile|gracile]]</I> forma <I>areolatum</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Cordosphaeridium gracile</I> forma <I>areolatum</I>. Williams and Fensome (2016, p.140) noted that the distinctive surface texture described by [[Eisenack, 1954b|Eisenack (1954b]]) may be a preservational artifact, and hence they recommended that this taxon be restricted to its type. Age: Oligocene. | + | forma <B><I>areolatum</I></B> ([[Eisenack, 1954b]], p.67, pl.12, fig.21) [[Williams and Fensome, 2016]], p.140. Holotype: [[Eisenack, 1954b]], p.67, pl.12, fig.21. Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium inodes subsp. gracile|Hystrichosphaeridium inodes]]</I> subsp. <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium inodes subsp. gracile|gracile]]</I> forma <I>areolatum</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Cordosphaeridium gracile</I> forma <I>areolatum</I>. [[Williams and Fensome, 2016|Williams and Fensome (2016]], p.140) noted that the distinctive surface texture described by [[Eisenack, 1954b|Eisenack (1954b]]) may be a preservational artifact, and hence they recommended that this taxon be restricted to its type. Age: Oligocene. |
[[Category:Index2016]] | [[Category:Index2016]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Index2016new]] | ||
[[Category:Taxon]] | [[Category:Taxon]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:14, 7 December 2016
forma areolatum (Eisenack, 1954b, p.67, pl.12, fig.21) Williams and Fensome, 2016, p.140. Holotype: Eisenack, 1954b, p.67, pl.12, fig.21. Originally Hystrichosphaeridium inodes subsp. gracile forma areolatum, subsequently (and now) Cordosphaeridium gracile forma areolatum. Williams and Fensome (2016, p.140) noted that the distinctive surface texture described by Eisenack (1954b) may be a preservational artifact, and hence they recommended that this taxon be restricted to its type. Age: Oligocene.
Parent: Cordosphaeridium gracile