Difference between revisions of "Amphidiadema similis"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ?<I><B>similis</B></I> [[Marheinecke, 1992]], p.80 | + | ?<I><B>similis</B></I> [[Marheinecke, 1992]], p.80–81, pl.16, figs.5–7; text-fig.14. Holotype: [[Marheinecke, 1992]], pl.16, fig.7. Questionable assignment: [[Marheinecke, 1992|Marheinecke (1992]], p.80). Contrary to the opinion of [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.24), [[Williams et al., 1998|Williams et al. (1998]], p.39) considered this name to be validly published. Age: early–late late Maastrichtian. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:02, 21 December 2016
?similis Marheinecke, 1992, p.80–81, pl.16, figs.5–7; text-fig.14. Holotype: Marheinecke, 1992, pl.16, fig.7. Questionable assignment: Marheinecke (1992, p.80). Contrary to the opinion of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.24), Williams et al. (1998, p.39) considered this name to be validly published. Age: early–late late Maastrichtian.
Parent: Amphidiadema