Difference between revisions of "Andriella trejoi"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "<B><I><nowiki>*</nowiki>trejoi</I></B>" ([[Bonet, 1956]], p.459 | + | "<B><I><nowiki>*</nowiki>trejoi</I></B>" ([[Bonet, 1956]], p.459–461, pl.27, figs.1–part,2) [[Bolli, 1974|Bolli 1974]], p.845. Holotype: not designated. <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Pithonella trejoi|Pithonella]]</I>. Originally (and now) <I>[[Pithonella trejoi|Pithonella]]</I>, subsequently <I>Andriella</I>. Athough no holotype was designated, [[Elbrächter et al., 2008|Elbrächter et al. (2008]], p.1298) implied that this name can be accepted as valid since it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N. Similarly, the combination <I>Andriella trejoi</I> was not accompanied by a basionym citation, but again [[Elbrächter et al., 2008|Elbrächter et al. (2008]], p.1298) implied that it can be accepted as valid since it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N. Age: late Albian–Turonian. |
[[Category:Index2016]] | [[Category:Index2016]] | ||
[[Category:Index2016new]] | [[Category:Index2016new]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:02, 21 December 2016
"*trejoi" (Bonet, 1956, p.459–461, pl.27, figs.1–part,2) Bolli 1974, p.845. Holotype: not designated. NOW Pithonella. Originally (and now) Pithonella, subsequently Andriella. Athough no holotype was designated, Elbrächter et al. (2008, p.1298) implied that this name can be accepted as valid since it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N. Similarly, the combination Andriella trejoi was not accompanied by a basionym citation, but again Elbrächter et al. (2008, p.1298) implied that it can be accepted as valid since it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N. Age: late Albian–Turonian.
Parent: Andriella