Difference between revisions of "Cladopyxidium verrucosum"

Latest revision as of 20:10, 21 December 2016

verrucosum Marheinecke, 1992, p.103, pl.22, figs.5–8,12. Holotype: Marheinecke, 1992, pl.22, figs.7–8,12. Contrary to the opinion of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.108), Williams et al. (1998, p.118) considered this name to be validly published. Age: early Maastrichtian.

Parent: Cladopyxidium

Revision as of 16:40, 4 December 2016 (view source) Maintenance script (Talk \| contribs) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 20:10, 21 December 2016 (view source) Maintenance script (Talk \| contribs)
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	<I><B>verrucosum</B></I> [[Marheinecke, 1992]], p.103, pl.22, figs.5-8,12.  Holotype: [[Marheinecke, 1992]], pl.22, figs.7-8,12.  Contrary to the opinion of [[Lentin and Williams, 1993\|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.108), [[Williams et al., 1998\|Williams et al. (1998]], p.118) considered this name to be validly published.  Age: ~~Early~~ Maastrichtian.	+	<I><B>verrucosum</B></I> [[Marheinecke, 1992]], p.103, pl.22, figs.5–8,12.  Holotype: [[Marheinecke, 1992]], pl.22, figs.7–8,12.  Contrary to the opinion of [[Lentin and Williams, 1993\|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.108), [[Williams et al., 1998\|Williams et al. (1998]], p.118) considered this name to be validly published.  Age: early Maastrichtian.
	[[Category:Index2004]]		[[Category:Index2004]]