Difference between revisions of "Cleistosphaeridium tribuliferum"
From dinoflaj3
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | "?<I><B>tribuliferum</B></I>" ([[Sarjeant, 1962a]], p.487 | + | "?<I><B>tribuliferum</B></I>" ([[Sarjeant, 1962a]], p.487–488, pl.70, fig.4; text-figs.6c,7) [[Davey et al., 1969]], p.16. Holotype: [[Sarjeant, 1962a]], pl.70, fig.4; [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004]], pl.23, fig.11. <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Downiesphaeridium tribuliferum|Downiesphaeridium]]</I>. Originally <I>[[Baltisphaeridium tribuliferum Appendix A|Baltisphaeridium]]</I> (Appendix A), subsequently <I>Cleistosphaeridium</I>, thirdly <I>Cleistosphaeridium</I>?, fourthly <I>[[Impletosphaeridium tribuliferum|Impletosphaeridium]]</I>, fifthly (and now) <I>[[Downiesphaeridium tribuliferum|Downiesphaeridium]]</I>. Questionable assignment: [[Stover and Evitt, 1978|Stover and Evitt (1978]], p.32). This combination was not validly published in [[Davey et al., 1966|Davey et al. (1966]], p.170), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: Oxfordian. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
− | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} |
Latest revision as of 19:11, 21 December 2016
"?tribuliferum" (Sarjeant, 1962a, p.487–488, pl.70, fig.4; text-figs.6c,7) Davey et al., 1969, p.16. Holotype: Sarjeant, 1962a, pl.70, fig.4; Fauconnier and Masure, 2004, pl.23, fig.11. NOW Downiesphaeridium. Originally Baltisphaeridium (Appendix A), subsequently Cleistosphaeridium, thirdly Cleistosphaeridium?, fourthly Impletosphaeridium, fifthly (and now) Downiesphaeridium. Questionable assignment: Stover and Evitt (1978, p.32). This combination was not validly published in Davey et al. (1966, p.170), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: Oxfordian.
Parent: Cleistosphaeridium