Difference between revisions of "Inocardion caucasicum"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"<B><I>caucasicum</I></B>" ([[Keller, 1946|Keller 1946]], p.95, pl.3, fig.2) [[Masters and Scott, 1978]], p.216.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Keller, 1946|Keller 1946]], pl.3, fig.2.&nbsp; <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Pithonella caucasica|Pithonella]]</I>.&nbsp; Originally (and now) <I>[[Pithonella caucasica|Pithonella]]</I>, subsequently <I>Inocardion</I>.&nbsp; As this combination was published under the I.C.Z.N., it can be considered validly published and legitimate when brought under the I.C.N., even though the basionym was not fully referenced.&nbsp; Age: information not availkable.
+
"<B><I>caucasicum</I></B>" ([[Keller, 1946|Keller 1946]], p.95, pl.3, fig.2) [[Masters and Scott, 1978]], p.216.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Keller, 1946|Keller 1946]], pl.3, fig.2.&nbsp; <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Pithonella caucasica|Pithonella]]</I>.&nbsp; Originally (and now) <I>[[Pithonella caucasica|Pithonella]]</I>, subsequently <I>Inocardion</I>.&nbsp; As this combination was published under the I.C.Z.N., it can be considered validly published and legitimate when brought under the I.C.N., even though the basionym was not fully referenced.&nbsp; Age: information not available.
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
 +
[[Category:Index2016new]]
  
 
[[Category:Taxon]]
 
[[Category:Taxon]]
Line 14: Line 15:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Latest revision as of 19:29, 21 December 2016

"caucasicum" (Keller 1946, p.95, pl.3, fig.2) Masters and Scott, 1978, p.216.  Holotype: Keller 1946, pl.3, fig.2.  NOW Pithonella.  Originally (and now) Pithonella, subsequently Inocardion.  As this combination was published under the I.C.Z.N., it can be considered validly published and legitimate when brought under the I.C.N., even though the basionym was not fully referenced.  Age: information not available.

Parent: Inocardion