Difference between revisions of "Lotharingia maubeugii"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<nowiki>*</nowiki><B><I>maubeugii</I></B> [[Below, 1990]], p.21-23, pl.4, figs.10-18; text-figs.5a-g.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Below, 1990]], pl.4, figs.11,13.&nbsp; Contrary to the opinion of [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.405), this name is validly published.&nbsp; [[Below, 1987a|Below (1987a]], p.6) stated that, unless otherwise indicated, all the material is in his personal collection.&nbsp; Since [[Below, 1987a|Below (1987a]], [[Below, 1987b|1987b]], [[Below, 1990|1990]]) are parts I to III of a single study, we agree with J. Jansonius (personal communication) that [[Below, 1987a|Below's (1987a]]) repository statement refers to all three publications, fulfilling the requirement of I.C.N. Article 40.7 (see also the discussion on Article 40.7 in the Introduction).&nbsp; This name was not validly published in [[Below, 1987a|Below (1987a]], p.57), who did not provide a description; [[Below, 1987a|Below (1987a]], caption to pl.26, fig.d) cited the name as <I>[[Saxodinium maubeugii]]</I>.&nbsp; Age: Toarcian.
+
<nowiki>*</nowiki><B><I>maubeugii</I></B> [[Below, 1990]], p.21&ndash;23, pl.4, figs.10&ndash;18; text-figs.5a&ndash;g.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Below, 1990]], pl.4, figs.11,13.&nbsp; Contrary to the opinion of [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.405), this name is validly published.&nbsp; [[Below, 1987a|Below (1987a]], p.6) stated that, unless otherwise indicated, all the material is in his personal collection.&nbsp; Since [[Below, 1987a|Below (1987a]], [[Below, 1987b|1987b]], [[Below, 1990|1990]]) are parts I to III of a single study, we agree with J. Jansonius (personal communication) that [[Below, 1987a|Below's (1987a]]) repository statement refers to all three publications, fulfilling the requirement of I.C.N. Article 40.7 (see also the discussion on Article 40.7 in the Introduction).&nbsp; This name was not validly published in [[Below, 1987a|Below (1987a]], p.57), who did not provide a description; [[Below, 1987a|Below (1987a]], caption to pl.26, fig.d) cited the name as <I>[[Saxodinium maubeugii]]</I>.&nbsp; Age: Toarcian.
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
  
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Latest revision as of 19:34, 21 December 2016

*maubeugii Below, 1990, p.21–23, pl.4, figs.10–18; text-figs.5a–g.  Holotype: Below, 1990, pl.4, figs.11,13.  Contrary to the opinion of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.405), this name is validly published.  Below (1987a, p.6) stated that, unless otherwise indicated, all the material is in his personal collection.  Since Below (1987a, 1987b, 1990) are parts I to III of a single study, we agree with J. Jansonius (personal communication) that Below's (1987a) repository statement refers to all three publications, fulfilling the requirement of I.C.N. Article 40.7 (see also the discussion on Article 40.7 in the Introduction).  This name was not validly published in Below (1987a, p.57), who did not provide a description; Below (1987a, caption to pl.26, fig.d) cited the name as Saxodinium maubeugii.  Age: Toarcian.

Parent: Lotharingia