Difference between revisions of "Meiourogonyaulax caytonensis"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<I><B>caytonensis</B></I> ([[Sarjeant, 1959]], p.330-332, pl.13, fig.1; text-fig.1) [[Sarjeant, 1969]], p.14.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Sarjeant, 1959]], pl.13, fig.1; text-fig.1.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Gonyaulax caytonensis Appendix B|Gonyaulax]]</I> (Appendix B), subsequently (and now) <I>Meiourogonyaulax</I>, thirdly <I>[[Lithodinia caytonensis|Lithodinia]]</I>.&nbsp; This species is here retained in <I>Meiourogonyaulax</I> following the retention of the genus by [[Riding and Helby, 2001d|Riding and Helby (2001d]], p.81,83).&nbsp; This combination, as a questionable assignment, was not validly published in [[Sarjeant, 1966b|Sarjeant (1966b]], p.146), since that author did not fully reference the basionym.&nbsp; Age: Early Callovian.
+
<I><B>caytonensis</B></I> ([[Sarjeant, 1959]], p.330&ndash;332, pl.13, fig.1; text-fig.1) [[Sarjeant, 1969]], p.14.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Sarjeant, 1959]], pl.13, fig.1; text-fig.1.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Gonyaulax caytonensis Appendix B|Gonyaulax]]</I> (Appendix B), subsequently (and now) <I>Meiourogonyaulax</I>, thirdly <I>[[Lithodinia caytonensis|Lithodinia]]</I>.&nbsp; This species is here retained in <I>Meiourogonyaulax</I> following the retention of the genus by [[Riding and Helby, 2001d|Riding and Helby (2001d]], p.81,83).&nbsp; This combination, as a questionable assignment, was not validly published in [[Sarjeant, 1966b|Sarjeant (1966b]], p.146), since that author did not fully reference the basionym.&nbsp; Age: early Callovian.
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
  

Latest revision as of 20:34, 21 December 2016

caytonensis (Sarjeant, 1959, p.330–332, pl.13, fig.1; text-fig.1) Sarjeant, 1969, p.14.  Holotype: Sarjeant, 1959, pl.13, fig.1; text-fig.1.  Originally Gonyaulax (Appendix B), subsequently (and now) Meiourogonyaulax, thirdly Lithodinia.  This species is here retained in Meiourogonyaulax following the retention of the genus by Riding and Helby (2001d, p.81,83).  This combination, as a questionable assignment, was not validly published in Sarjeant (1966b, p.146), since that author did not fully reference the basionym.  Age: early Callovian.

Parent: Meiourogonyaulax