Difference between revisions of "Meiourogonyaulax rioultii"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ?<I><B>rioultii</B></I> [[Sarjeant, 1965]], p.181, pl.1, fig.1; text-fig.1 ex [[Sarjeant, 1968]], p.229. Holotype: [[Sarjeant, 1965]], pl.1, fig.1. Originally <I>Meiourogonyaulax</I>, subsequently <I>[[Lithodinia rioultii|Lithodinia]]</I>, thirdly (and now) <I>Meiourogonyaulax</I>?, fourthly <I>[[Lithodinia rioultii|Lithodinia]]</I>?. This species is here retained in <I>Meiourogonyaulax</I> following the retention of the genus by [[Riding and Helby, 2001d|Riding and Helby (2001d]], p.81,83). Questionable assignment: [[Stover and Evitt, 1978|Stover and Evitt (1978]], p.63) as a problematic species. This name was not validly published in [[Sarjeant, 1965|Sarjeant (1965]], p.181) since the genus <I>Meiourogonyaulax</I> was not validly published until 1966. Age: | + | ?<I><B>rioultii</B></I> [[Sarjeant, 1965]], p.181, pl.1, fig.1; text-fig.1 ex [[Sarjeant, 1968]], p.229. Holotype: [[Sarjeant, 1965]], pl.1, fig.1. Originally <I>Meiourogonyaulax</I>, subsequently <I>[[Lithodinia rioultii|Lithodinia]]</I>, thirdly (and now) <I>Meiourogonyaulax</I>?, fourthly <I>[[Lithodinia rioultii|Lithodinia]]</I>?. This species is here retained in <I>Meiourogonyaulax</I> following the retention of the genus by [[Riding and Helby, 2001d|Riding and Helby (2001d]], p.81,83). Questionable assignment: [[Stover and Evitt, 1978|Stover and Evitt (1978]], p.63) as a problematic species. This name was not validly published in [[Sarjeant, 1965|Sarjeant (1965]], p.181) since the genus <I>Meiourogonyaulax</I> was not validly published until 1966. Age: early Callovian. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:34, 21 December 2016
?rioultii Sarjeant, 1965, p.181, pl.1, fig.1; text-fig.1 ex Sarjeant, 1968, p.229. Holotype: Sarjeant, 1965, pl.1, fig.1. Originally Meiourogonyaulax, subsequently Lithodinia, thirdly (and now) Meiourogonyaulax?, fourthly Lithodinia?. This species is here retained in Meiourogonyaulax following the retention of the genus by Riding and Helby (2001d, p.81,83). Questionable assignment: Stover and Evitt (1978, p.63) as a problematic species. This name was not validly published in Sarjeant (1965, p.181) since the genus Meiourogonyaulax was not validly published until 1966. Age: early Callovian.
Parent: Meiourogonyaulax