Difference between revisions of "Multispinula"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"<I><B>MULTISPINULA</B></I>" [[Bradford, 1975]], p.3067.&nbsp; <B>Taxonomic senior synonym</B>: <I>[[Selenopemphix]]</I>, according to [[Matsuoka, 1985a|Matsuoka (1985a]], p.51) and [[Head, 1993|Head (1993]], p.31-32).&nbsp; Harland and Reid in [[Harland et al., 1980|Harland et al. (1980]], p.222) considered <I>Multispinula</I> to be not validly published in [[Bradford, 1975|Bradford (1975]]) because it lacked a Latin diagnosis.&nbsp; However, since the type is a fossil, a Latin diagnosis is not a requirement.&nbsp; Type: [[Bradford, 1975]], fig.5, as <I>[[Multispinula quanta]]</I>.
+
"<I><B>MULTISPINULA</B></I>" [[Bradford, 1975]], p.3067.&nbsp; <B>Taxonomic senior synonym</B>: <I>[[Selenopemphix]]</I>, according to [[Matsuoka, 1985a|Matsuoka (1985a]], p.51) and [[Head, 1993|Head (1993]], p.31&ndash;32).&nbsp; Harland and Reid in [[Harland et al., 1980|Harland et al. (1980]], p.222) considered <I>Multispinula</I> to be not validly published in [[Bradford, 1975|Bradford (1975]]) because it lacked a Latin diagnosis.&nbsp; However, since the type is a fossil, a Latin diagnosis is not a requirement.&nbsp; Type: [[Bradford, 1975]], fig.5, as <I>[[Multispinula quanta]]</I>.
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
  
Line 12: Line 12:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Latest revision as of 19:37, 21 December 2016

"MULTISPINULA" Bradford, 1975, p.3067.  Taxonomic senior synonym: Selenopemphix, according to Matsuoka (1985a, p.51) and Head (1993, p.31–32).  Harland and Reid in Harland et al. (1980, p.222) considered Multispinula to be not validly published in Bradford (1975) because it lacked a Latin diagnosis.  However, since the type is a fossil, a Latin diagnosis is not a requirement.  Type: Bradford, 1975, fig.5, as Multispinula quanta.

Species List: