Difference between revisions of "Palaecysta palmula"
From dinoflaj3
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <B><I>palmula</I></B> ([[Davey, 1982b]], p.11 | + | <B><I>palmula</I></B> ([[Davey, 1982b]], p.11–12, pl.1, figs.1–4) [[Williams and Fensome, 2016]], p.140. Holotype: [[Davey, 1982b]], pl.1, figs.1–3; [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004]], pl.76, figs.11–13 Originally <I>[[Systematophora palmula|Systematophora]]</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Palaecysta</I>. This combination was not validly published in [[Chen, 2013|Chen (2013]], p.293), since that author did not fully reference the basionym. [[Chen, 2013|Chen (2013]], p.293) listed some of his illustrations as paratypes; however, since Chen's paper does not constitute the protologue for this species, and as the illustations do not purport to be from [[Davey, 1982b|Davey's (1982b]]) original study, they are not paratypes. Age: Ryazanian–Valanginian. |
[[Category:Index2016]] | [[Category:Index2016]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Index2016new]] | ||
[[Category:Taxon]] | [[Category:Taxon]] | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:40, 21 December 2016
palmula (Davey, 1982b, p.11–12, pl.1, figs.1–4) Williams and Fensome, 2016, p.140. Holotype: Davey, 1982b, pl.1, figs.1–3; Fauconnier and Masure, 2004, pl.76, figs.11–13 Originally Systematophora, subsequently (and now) Palaecysta. This combination was not validly published in Chen (2013, p.293), since that author did not fully reference the basionym. Chen (2013, p.293) listed some of his illustrations as paratypes; however, since Chen's paper does not constitute the protologue for this species, and as the illustations do not purport to be from Davey's (1982b) original study, they are not paratypes. Age: Ryazanian–Valanginian.
Parent: Palaecysta
Infrataxon List: