Difference between revisions of "Palaeoperidinium velatum"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "?<I><B>velatum</B></I>" [[Conrad, 1941]], p.8 | + | "?<I><B>velatum</B></I>" [[Conrad, 1941]], p.8–9, pl.1, fig.A. Holotype: [[Conrad, 1941]], pl.1, fig.A. <B>Name not validly published</B>: generic name not validly published until 1967. <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Trithyrodinium velatum|Trithyrodinium]]</I>?. Originally <I>Palaeoperidinium</I> (name not validly published), subsequently <I>[[Scriniodinium velatum|Scriniodinium]]</I>?, thirdly <I>Palaeoperidinium</I>? (combination not validly published), fourthly (and now) <I>[[Trithyrodinium velatum|Trithyrodinium]]</I>?. Questionable assignment: [[Stover and Evitt, 1978|Stover and Evitt (1978]], p.218) as a problematic species. This combination was not validly published in [[Stover and Evitt, 1978|Stover and Evitt (1978]], p.218) since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: Maastrichtian. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:41, 21 December 2016
"?velatum" Conrad, 1941, p.8–9, pl.1, fig.A. Holotype: Conrad, 1941, pl.1, fig.A. Name not validly published: generic name not validly published until 1967. NOW Trithyrodinium?. Originally Palaeoperidinium (name not validly published), subsequently Scriniodinium?, thirdly Palaeoperidinium? (combination not validly published), fourthly (and now) Trithyrodinium?. Questionable assignment: Stover and Evitt (1978, p.218) as a problematic species. This combination was not validly published in Stover and Evitt (1978, p.218) since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: Maastrichtian.
Parent: Palaeoperidinium