Difference between revisions of "Phthanoperidinium resistente"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<I><B>resistente</B></I> ([[Morgenroth, 1966a]], p.5, pl.2, figs.1-2) [[Eisenack and Kjellstr&#246;m, 1972]], p.911.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Morgenroth, 1966a]], pl.2, figs.1-2.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Peridinium resistente Appendix B|Peridinium]]</I> (Appendix B), subsequently (and now) <I>Phthanoperidinium</I>.&nbsp; [[Stover and Evitt, 1978|Stover and Evitt (1978]], p.119) considered this species to be a possible taxonomic junior synonym of <I>[[Phthanoperidinium eocenicum]]</I>.&nbsp; [[Eaton, 1976|Eaton (1976]], p.294) also proposed this combination.&nbsp; Age: Early Eocene.
+
<I><B>resistente</B></I> ([[Morgenroth, 1966a]], p.5, pl.2, figs.1&ndash;2) [[Eisenack and Kjellstr&#246;m, 1972]], p.911.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Morgenroth, 1966a]], pl.2, figs.1&ndash;2.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Peridinium resistente Appendix B|Peridinium]]</I> (Appendix B), subsequently (and now) <I>Phthanoperidinium</I>.&nbsp; [[Stover and Evitt, 1978|Stover and Evitt (1978]], p.119) considered this species to be a possible taxonomic junior synonym of <I>[[Phthanoperidinium eocenicum]]</I>.&nbsp; [[Eaton, 1976|Eaton (1976]], p.294) also proposed this combination.&nbsp; Age: early Eocene.
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
  
Line 12: Line 12:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Latest revision as of 20:43, 21 December 2016

resistente (Morgenroth, 1966a, p.5, pl.2, figs.1–2) Eisenack and Kjellström, 1972, p.911.  Holotype: Morgenroth, 1966a, pl.2, figs.1–2.  Originally Peridinium (Appendix B), subsequently (and now) PhthanoperidiniumStover and Evitt (1978, p.119) considered this species to be a possible taxonomic junior synonym of Phthanoperidinium eocenicumEaton (1976, p.294) also proposed this combination.  Age: early Eocene.

Parent: Phthanoperidinium