Difference between revisions of "Polystephanephorus urnaformis"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"<I><B>urnaformis</B></I>" ([[Cookson, 1953]], p.118, pl.2, figs.41-43) [[Sarjeant, 1961b]], p.1096.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Cookson, 1953]], pl.2, figs.41-42.&nbsp; <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Emmetrocysta urnaformis|Emmetrocysta]]</I>.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Cannosphaeropsis urnaformis|Cannosphaeropsis]]</I>, subsequently <I>Polystephanephorus</I>, thirdly (and now) <I>[[Emmetrocysta urnaformis|Emmetrocysta]]</I>.&nbsp; Although [[Sarjeant, 1961b|Sarjeant (1961b]], p.1096) did not fully reference the basionym when he proposed this combination, he was clearly using zoological nomenclature, which does not require basionym citations.&nbsp; Age: Oligocene.
+
"<I><B>urnaformis</B></I>" ([[Cookson, 1953]], p.118, pl.2, figs.41&ndash;43) [[Sarjeant, 1961b]], p.1096.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Cookson, 1953]], pl.2, figs.41&ndash;42.&nbsp; <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Emmetrocysta urnaformis|Emmetrocysta]]</I>.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Cannosphaeropsis urnaformis|Cannosphaeropsis]]</I>, subsequently <I>Polystephanephorus</I>, thirdly (and now) <I>[[Emmetrocysta urnaformis|Emmetrocysta]]</I>.&nbsp; Although [[Sarjeant, 1961b|Sarjeant (1961b]], p.1096) did not fully reference the basionym when he proposed this combination, he was clearly using zoological nomenclature, which does not require basionym citations.&nbsp; Age: Oligocene.
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
  
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Latest revision as of 20:45, 21 December 2016

"urnaformis" (Cookson, 1953, p.118, pl.2, figs.41–43) Sarjeant, 1961b, p.1096.  Holotype: Cookson, 1953, pl.2, figs.41–42.  NOW Emmetrocysta.  Originally Cannosphaeropsis, subsequently Polystephanephorus, thirdly (and now) Emmetrocysta.  Although Sarjeant (1961b, p.1096) did not fully reference the basionym when he proposed this combination, he was clearly using zoological nomenclature, which does not require basionym citations.  Age: Oligocene.

Parent: Polystephanephorus