Difference between revisions of "Praecalcigonellum mutterlosei"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<I><B>mutterlosei</B></I> ([[Keupp, 1979a]], p.41, pl.10, figs.11-12; pl.11, figs.1-5) [[Lentin and Williams, 1993]], p.538.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Keupp, 1979a]], pl.11, figs. 1-3.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Calcicarpinum mutterlosei|Calcicarpinum]]</I>, subsequently <I>[[Calcigonellum mutterlosei|Calcigonellum]]</I>, thirdly (and now) <I>Praecalcigonellum</I>.&nbsp; This combination was not validly published in [[Keupp and Versteegh, 1989|Keupp and Versteegh (1989]], p.218, pl.2, fig.11), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym.&nbsp; Age: Early Barremian.
+
<I><B>mutterlosei</B></I> ([[Keupp, 1979a]], p.41, pl.10, figs.11&ndash;12; pl.11, figs.1&ndash;5) [[Lentin and Williams, 1993]], p.538.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Keupp, 1979a]], pl.11, figs.1&ndash;3.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Calcicarpinum mutterlosei|Calcicarpinum]]</I>, subsequently <I>[[Calcigonellum mutterlosei|Calcigonellum]]</I>, thirdly (and now) <I>Praecalcigonellum</I>.&nbsp; This combination was not validly published in [[Keupp and Versteegh, 1989|Keupp and Versteegh (1989]], p.218, pl.2, fig.11), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym.&nbsp; Age: early Barremian.
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
  
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Latest revision as of 19:45, 21 December 2016

mutterlosei (Keupp, 1979a, p.41, pl.10, figs.11–12; pl.11, figs.1–5) Lentin and Williams, 1993, p.538.  Holotype: Keupp, 1979a, pl.11, figs.1–3.  Originally Calcicarpinum, subsequently Calcigonellum, thirdly (and now) Praecalcigonellum.  This combination was not validly published in Keupp and Versteegh (1989, p.218, pl.2, fig.11), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym.  Age: early Barremian.

Parent: Praecalcigonellum