Difference between revisions of "Sentusidinium bifidum"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ?<I><B>bifidum</B></I> ([[Jiabo, 1978]], p.51 | + | ?<I><B>bifidum</B></I> ([[Jiabo, 1978]], p.51–52, pl.22, figs.7–16) He Chengquan, Zhu Shenzhao and Jin Guangxing in [[He Chengquan et al., 1989]], p.66–67, pl.16, figs.17–23. Holotype: [[Jiabo, 1978]], pl.22, fig.8. Originally <I>[[Tenua bifidis|Tenua]]</I> Eisenack, subsequently <I>[[Cleistosphaeridium bifide|Cleistosphaeridium]]</I>?, thirdly (and now) <I>Sentusidinium</I>. Questionable assignment: [[Xu Jinli et al., 1997|Xu Jinli et al. (1997]], p.46); and Courtinat in [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004|Fauconnier and Masure (2004]], p.486) as a problematic species. [[Islam, 1993|Islam (1993]], p.87) also proposed this combination. Age: Early Tertiary. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:50, 21 December 2016
?bifidum (Jiabo, 1978, p.51–52, pl.22, figs.7–16) He Chengquan, Zhu Shenzhao and Jin Guangxing in He Chengquan et al., 1989, p.66–67, pl.16, figs.17–23. Holotype: Jiabo, 1978, pl.22, fig.8. Originally Tenua Eisenack, subsequently Cleistosphaeridium?, thirdly (and now) Sentusidinium. Questionable assignment: Xu Jinli et al. (1997, p.46); and Courtinat in Fauconnier and Masure (2004, p.486) as a problematic species. Islam (1993, p.87) also proposed this combination. Age: Early Tertiary.
Parent: Sentusidinium