Difference between revisions of "Sentusidinium millepiedii"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
?<I><B>millepiedii</B></I> nom nov subst pro <I>Sentusidinium</I>? <I>brevispinosum</I> ([[Jain and Millepied, 1975]], p.150, pl.5, figs.80-82) [[Islam, 1993]], p.87.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Jain and Millepied, 1975]], pl.5, figs.80-81; [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004]], pl.69, fig.6.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Cleistosphaeridium brevispinosum|Cleistosphaeridium]]</I>? <I>[[Cleistosphaeridium brevispinosum|brevispinosum]]</I>, subsequently <I>Sentusidinium brevispinosum</I> (combination illegitimate), thirdly <I>Sentusidinium</I>? <I>brevispinosum</I> (combination illegitimate), fourthly (and now) <I>Sentusidinium</I>? <I>millepiedii</I>.&nbsp; Questionable assignment: Courtinat in [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004|Fauconnier and Masure (2004]], p.486), who considered <I>Sentusidinium brevispinosum</I> (Jain and Millepied) to be a problematic species.&nbsp; The name <I>Sentusidinium</I>? <I>millepiedii</I> is proposed here because the name <I>Sentusidinium brevispinosum</I> is preoccupied.&nbsp; Age: Aptian.
+
?<B><I>millepiedii</I></B> [[Fensome and Williams, 2004]], p.601.&nbsp; Substitute name for <I>Sentusidinium</I>? <I>brevispinosum</I> ([[Jain and Millepied, 1975]], p.150, pl.5, figs.80&ndash;82) [[Islam, 1993]], p.87.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Jain and Millepied, 1975]], pl.5, figs.80&ndash;81; [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004]], pl.69, fig.6.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Cleistosphaeridium brevispinosum|Cleistosphaeridium]]</I>? <I>[[Cleistosphaeridium brevispinosum|brevispinosum]]</I>, subsequently <I>Sentusidinium brevispinosum</I> (combination illegitimate), thirdly <I>Sentusidinium</I>? <I>brevispinosum</I> (combination illegitimate), fourthly (and now) <I>Sentusidinium</I>? <I>millepiedii</I>.&nbsp; Questionable assignment: Courtinat in [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004|Fauconnier and Masure (2004]], p.486), who considered <I>Sentusidinium brevispinosum</I> (Jain and Millepied) to be a problematic species.&nbsp; Age: Aptian.
[[Category:Index2004]]
+
[[Category:Index2016]]
  
 
[[Category:Taxon]]
 
[[Category:Taxon]]
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Latest revision as of 19:50, 21 December 2016

?millepiedii Fensome and Williams, 2004, p.601.  Substitute name for Sentusidinium? brevispinosum (Jain and Millepied, 1975, p.150, pl.5, figs.80–82) Islam, 1993, p.87.  Holotype: Jain and Millepied, 1975, pl.5, figs.80–81; Fauconnier and Masure, 2004, pl.69, fig.6.  Originally Cleistosphaeridium? brevispinosum, subsequently Sentusidinium brevispinosum (combination illegitimate), thirdly Sentusidinium? brevispinosum (combination illegitimate), fourthly (and now) Sentusidinium? millepiedii.  Questionable assignment: Courtinat in Fauconnier and Masure (2004, p.486), who considered Sentusidinium brevispinosum (Jain and Millepied) to be a problematic species.  Age: Aptian.

Parent: Sentusidinium