Difference between revisions of "Baltisphaeridium baciferum Appendix A"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
"<I><B>baciferum</B></I>" ([[Eisenack, 1934]], p.66, pl.4, figs.20-21) [[Cramer and Diez, 1979]], p.44.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Eisenack, 1934]], pl.4, fig.20, lost according to [[Eisenack, 1962|Eisenack (1962]], p.356).&nbsp; Neotype: [[Eisenack, 1962]], pl.44, fig.3, designated by [[Eisenack, 1962|Eisenack (1962]], p.356).&nbsp; <B>Combination not validly published</B>: basionym not fully referenced.&nbsp; <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Bacisphaeridium baciferum Appendix A|Bacisphaeridium]]</I> (Appendix A).&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Bion baciferum Appendix A|Bion]]</I> (Appendix A), subsequently <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium baciferum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I>, thirdly <I>[[Veryhachium baciferum Appendix A|Veryhachium]]</I> (combination not validly published, Appendix A), fourthly (and now) <I>[[Bacisphaeridium baciferum Appendix A|Bacisphaeridium]]</I> (Appendix A), fifthly <I>Baltisphaeridium</I> (combination not validly published).&nbsp; [[Cramer and Diez, 1979|Cramer and Diez (1979]]) apparently did not intend to propose this as a new combination.&nbsp; Age: Late Ordovician.
+
"<I><B>baciferum</B></I>" ([[Eisenack, 1934]], p.66, pl.4, figs.20&ndash;21) [[Cramer and Diez, 1979]], p.44.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Eisenack, 1934]], pl.4, fig.20, lost according to [[Eisenack, 1962|Eisenack (1962]], p.356).&nbsp; Neotype: [[Eisenack, 1962]], pl.44, fig.3, designated by [[Eisenack, 1962|Eisenack (1962]], p.356).&nbsp; <B>Combination not validly published</B>: basionym not fully referenced.&nbsp; <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Bacisphaeridium baciferum Appendix A|Bacisphaeridium]]</I> (Appendix A).&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Bion baciferum Appendix A|Bion]]</I> (Appendix A), subsequently <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium baciferum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I>, thirdly <I>[[Veryhachium baciferum Appendix A|Veryhachium]]</I> (combination not validly published, Appendix A), fourthly (and now) <I>[[Bacisphaeridium baciferum Appendix A|Bacisphaeridium]]</I> (Appendix A), fifthly <I>Baltisphaeridium</I> (combination not validly published).&nbsp; [[Cramer and Diez, 1979|Cramer and Diez (1979]]) apparently did not intend to propose this as a new combination.&nbsp; Age: Late Ordovician.
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
  

Latest revision as of 19:59, 21 December 2016

"baciferum" (Eisenack, 1934, p.66, pl.4, figs.20–21) Cramer and Diez, 1979, p.44.  Holotype: Eisenack, 1934, pl.4, fig.20, lost according to Eisenack (1962, p.356).  Neotype: Eisenack, 1962, pl.44, fig.3, designated by Eisenack (1962, p.356).  Combination not validly published: basionym not fully referenced.  NOW Bacisphaeridium (Appendix A).  Originally Bion (Appendix A), subsequently Hystrichosphaeridium, thirdly Veryhachium (combination not validly published, Appendix A), fourthly (and now) Bacisphaeridium (Appendix A), fifthly Baltisphaeridium (combination not validly published).  Cramer and Diez (1979) apparently did not intend to propose this as a new combination.  Age: Late Ordovician.

Parent: Baltisphaeridium_Appendix A