Difference between revisions of "Spicadinium nenjiangense Appendix A"
From dinoflaj3
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "<I><B>nenjiangense</B></I>" ([[Gao Ruiqi et al., 1992a]], p.18,24, pl.3, figs.1 | + | "<I><B>nenjiangense</B></I>" ([[Gao Ruiqi et al., 1992a]], p.18,24, pl.3, figs.1–9; pl.4, figs.1–7) [[Schrank, 2001]], p.204. Holotype: [[Gao Ruiqi et al., 1992a]], pl.3, fig.1. Originally <I>[[Cleistosphaeridium nenjiangense|Cleistosphaeridium]]</I>, subsequently <I>[[Impletosphaeridium nenjiangense|Impletosphaeridium]]</I>, thirdly <I>Spicadinium</I>. <B>Taxonomic senior synonym</B>: <I>[[Spicadinium akidoton Appendix A|Spicadinium akidoton]]</I>, according to [[Mao Shaozhi et al., 1999|Mao Shaozhi et al. (1999]], p.159). This combination was also proposed by Masure in [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004|Fauconnier and Masure (2004]], p.346). In proposing this combination, neither Schrank nor Masure acknowledged the synonymy proposed by [[Mao Shaozhi et al., 1999|Mao Shaozhi et al. (1999]]); we therefore follow the latter treatment. Age: Campanian. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:03, 21 December 2016
"nenjiangense" (Gao Ruiqi et al., 1992a, p.18,24, pl.3, figs.1–9; pl.4, figs.1–7) Schrank, 2001, p.204. Holotype: Gao Ruiqi et al., 1992a, pl.3, fig.1. Originally Cleistosphaeridium, subsequently Impletosphaeridium, thirdly Spicadinium. Taxonomic senior synonym: Spicadinium akidoton, according to Mao Shaozhi et al. (1999, p.159). This combination was also proposed by Masure in Fauconnier and Masure (2004, p.346). In proposing this combination, neither Schrank nor Masure acknowledged the synonymy proposed by Mao Shaozhi et al. (1999); we therefore follow the latter treatment. Age: Campanian.
Parent: Spicadinium_Appendix A