Difference between revisions of "Dichadogonyaulax pannea"
From dinoflaj3
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ?<I><B>pannea</B></I> ([[Norris, 1965]], p.796 | + | ?<I><B>pannea</B></I> ([[Norris, 1965]], p.796–798, figs.3,10–13) [[Sarjeant, 1969]], p.14. Holotype: [[Norris, 1965]], figs.10–12. Originally <I>[[Leptodinium panneum|Leptodinium]]</I>, subsequently <I>Dichadogonyaulax</I>, thirdly <I>[[Ctenidodinium panneum|Ctenidodinium]]</I>, fourthly (and now) <I>Dichadogonyaulax</I>?. [[Benson, 1985|Benson (1985]], p.152) retained this species in <I>Dichadogonyaulax</I>. Questionable assignment: [[Riding, 1987a|Riding (1987a]], p.260). This combination was not validly published in [[Sarjeant, 1966b|Sarjeant (1966b]], p.153), since that author did not fully reference the basionym. Age: Kimmeridgian–Portlandian. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
| + | [[Category:HasImage]] | ||
| − | <BR><CENTER>[[Image:Dichadogonyaulax_pannea.jpg]]</CENTER> | + | <BR><CENTER>[[Image:Dichadogonyaulax_pannea.jpg|link=]]</CENTER> |
[[Category:Taxon]] | [[Category:Taxon]] | ||
[[Category:Species|pannea Dichadogonyaulax]] | [[Category:Species|pannea Dichadogonyaulax]] | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:24, 30 December 2016
?pannea (Norris, 1965, p.796–798, figs.3,10–13) Sarjeant, 1969, p.14. Holotype: Norris, 1965, figs.10–12. Originally Leptodinium, subsequently Dichadogonyaulax, thirdly Ctenidodinium, fourthly (and now) Dichadogonyaulax?. Benson (1985, p.152) retained this species in Dichadogonyaulax. Questionable assignment: Riding (1987a, p.260). This combination was not validly published in Sarjeant (1966b, p.153), since that author did not fully reference the basionym. Age: Kimmeridgian–Portlandian.
