Difference between revisions of "Dichadogonyaulax pannea"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
?<I><B>pannea</B></I> ([[Norris, 1965]], p.796–798, figs.3,10–13) [[Sarjeant, 1969]], p.14. Holotype: [[Norris, 1965]], figs.10–12. Originally <I>[[Leptodinium panneum|Leptodinium]]</I>, subsequently <I>Dichadogonyaulax</I>, thirdly <I>[[Ctenidodinium panneum|Ctenidodinium]]</I>, fourthly (and now) <I>Dichadogonyaulax</I>?. [[Benson, 1985|Benson (1985]], p.152) retained this species in <I>Dichadogonyaulax</I>. Questionable assignment: [[Riding, 1987a|Riding (1987a]], p.260). This combination was not validly published in [[Sarjeant, 1966b|Sarjeant (1966b]], p.153), since that author did not fully reference the basionym. Age: Kimmeridgian–Portlandian. | ?<I><B>pannea</B></I> ([[Norris, 1965]], p.796–798, figs.3,10–13) [[Sarjeant, 1969]], p.14. Holotype: [[Norris, 1965]], figs.10–12. Originally <I>[[Leptodinium panneum|Leptodinium]]</I>, subsequently <I>Dichadogonyaulax</I>, thirdly <I>[[Ctenidodinium panneum|Ctenidodinium]]</I>, fourthly (and now) <I>Dichadogonyaulax</I>?. [[Benson, 1985|Benson (1985]], p.152) retained this species in <I>Dichadogonyaulax</I>. Questionable assignment: [[Riding, 1987a|Riding (1987a]], p.260). This combination was not validly published in [[Sarjeant, 1966b|Sarjeant (1966b]], p.153), since that author did not fully reference the basionym. Age: Kimmeridgian–Portlandian. | ||
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
| + | [[Category:HasImage]] | ||
<BR><CENTER>[[Image:Dichadogonyaulax_pannea.jpg|link=]]</CENTER> | <BR><CENTER>[[Image:Dichadogonyaulax_pannea.jpg|link=]]</CENTER> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:24, 30 December 2016
?pannea (Norris, 1965, p.796–798, figs.3,10–13) Sarjeant, 1969, p.14. Holotype: Norris, 1965, figs.10–12. Originally Leptodinium, subsequently Dichadogonyaulax, thirdly Ctenidodinium, fourthly (and now) Dichadogonyaulax?. Benson (1985, p.152) retained this species in Dichadogonyaulax. Questionable assignment: Riding (1987a, p.260). This combination was not validly published in Sarjeant (1966b, p.153), since that author did not fully reference the basionym. Age: Kimmeridgian–Portlandian.
