Difference between revisions of "Dingodinium tuberosum"
From dinoflaj3
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <I><B>tuberosum</B></I> ([[Gitmez, 1970]], p.307 | + | <I><B>tuberosum</B></I> ([[Gitmez, 1970]], p.307–308, pl.6, fig.9; text-fig.31) [[Fisher and Riley, 1980]], p.319–320. Emendation: [[Poulsen, 1996]], p.83, as <I>Dingodinium tuberosum</I>. Holotype: [[Gitmez, 1970]], pl.6, fig.9; text-fig.31. Originally <I>[[Parvocavatus tuberosus|Parvocavatus]]</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Dingodinium</I>, thirdly <I>Dingodinium</I>?. Questionable assignment: [[Stover and Helby, 1987d|Stover and Helby (1987d]], p.282) — however, [[Poulsen, 1996|Poulsen (1996]], p.83) retained this species in <I>Dingodinium</I> without question. This combination was not validly published in [[Fisher and Riley, 1976|Fisher and Riley (1976]], p.52), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: early Kimmeridgian. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
| + | [[Category:HasImage]] | ||
| − | <BR | + | <BR><CENTER>[[Image:Dingodinium_tuberosum.jpg|link=]]</CENTER> |
[[Category:Taxon]] | [[Category:Taxon]] | ||
[[Category:Species|tuberosum Dingodinium]] | [[Category:Species|tuberosum Dingodinium]] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:24, 30 December 2016
tuberosum (Gitmez, 1970, p.307–308, pl.6, fig.9; text-fig.31) Fisher and Riley, 1980, p.319–320. Emendation: Poulsen, 1996, p.83, as Dingodinium tuberosum. Holotype: Gitmez, 1970, pl.6, fig.9; text-fig.31. Originally Parvocavatus, subsequently (and now) Dingodinium, thirdly Dingodinium?. Questionable assignment: Stover and Helby (1987d, p.282) — however, Poulsen (1996, p.83) retained this species in Dingodinium without question. This combination was not validly published in Fisher and Riley (1976, p.52), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: early Kimmeridgian.
