Difference between revisions of "Scriniodinium velatum"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "?<B><I>velatum</I></B>" [[Conrad, 1941]], p.8 | + | "?<B><I>velatum</I></B>" [[Conrad, 1941]], p.8–9, pl.1, fig.A ex [[Sarjeant, 1967b]], p.256. Holotype: [[Conrad, 1941]], pl.1, fig.A. <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Trithyrodinium velatum|Trithyrodinium]]</I>?. Originally <I>[[Palaeoperidinium velatum|Palaeoperidinium]]</I> (name not validly published), subsequently <I>Scriniodinium</I>?, thirdly <I>[[Palaeoperidinium velatum|Palaeoperidinium]]</I>? (combination not validly published), fourthly (and now) <I>[[Trithyrodinium velatum|Trithyrodinium]]</I>?. Questionable assignment: [[Sarjeant, 1967b|Sarjeant (1967b]], p.256). The name <I>[[Palaeoperidinium velatum]]</I> was not validly published in [[Conrad, 1941|Conrad (1941]]) since the generic name <I>[[Palaeoperidinium velatum|Palaeoperidinium]]</I> was not validly published until 1967. [[Williams et al., 1998|Williams et al. (1998]], p.550) accepted [[Sarjeant, 1967b|Sarjeant's (1967b]]) indirect reference to [[Conrad, 1941|Conrad (1941]]) as indication of a type (I.C.N. Article 40.3). [[Lentin and Williams, 1976|Lentin and Williams (1976]], p.111) also proposed this name, as a new combination. Age: Maastrichtian. |
[[Category:Index2016]] | [[Category:Index2016]] | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | |?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>, | ||
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | |?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>, | ||
| − | |limit= | + | |limit=400 |
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | |format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest | ||
|?Category:Quoted#",''' | |?Category:Quoted#",''' | ||
|Outro=</div>}} | |Outro=</div>}} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:49, 21 December 2016
"?velatum" Conrad, 1941, p.8–9, pl.1, fig.A ex Sarjeant, 1967b, p.256. Holotype: Conrad, 1941, pl.1, fig.A. NOW Trithyrodinium?. Originally Palaeoperidinium (name not validly published), subsequently Scriniodinium?, thirdly Palaeoperidinium? (combination not validly published), fourthly (and now) Trithyrodinium?. Questionable assignment: Sarjeant (1967b, p.256). The name Palaeoperidinium velatum was not validly published in Conrad (1941) since the generic name Palaeoperidinium was not validly published until 1967. Williams et al. (1998, p.550) accepted Sarjeant's (1967b) indirect reference to Conrad (1941) as indication of a type (I.C.N. Article 40.3). Lentin and Williams (1976, p.111) also proposed this name, as a new combination. Age: Maastrichtian.
Parent: Scriniodinium