Difference between revisions of "Cadosina"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<B><I>CADOSINA</I></B> [[Wanner, 1940]], p.79.&nbsp; Calcareous dinoflagellate genus, originally described as a foraminifer (see [[Elbr&#228;chter et al., 2008]], p.1298).&nbsp; Emendation: [[Masters and Scott, 1978]], p.220.&nbsp; Taxonomic senior synonym: <I>[[Stomiosphaera]]</I>, according to [[Bonet, 1956|Bonet (1956]], p.447-448 - however, [[I. Nagy, 1966|I. Nagy (1966]], p.87) proposed the retention of <I>Cadosina</I>.&nbsp; Taxonomic junior synonyms: <I>[[Hemistomiosphaera]]</I>, according to [[&#344;eh&#225;nek and Cecca, 1993|&#344;eh&#225;nek and Cecca (1993]], p.155); <I>[[Obliquipithonella]]</I>, according to [[Reh&#225;kov&#225; and Michal&#237;k, 1996|Reh&#225;kov&#225; and Michal&#237;k (1996]], p.93) - however, <I>[[Obliquipithonella]]</I> is now considered a taxonomic junior synonym of <I>[[Pirumella]]</I>.&nbsp; [[Fensome and Williams, 2004|Fensome and Williams (2004]]) considered this genus to be not validly published because a type was not designated.&nbsp; However, [[Elbr&#228;chter et al., 2008|Elbr&#228;chter et al. (2008]], p.1298) implied that this generic name can be considered validly published as it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N.&nbsp; Thus, we have revised the status of the contained species as appropriate, as well as reconsidered the generic synonymies.&nbsp; According to [[&#344;eh&#225;nek and Cecca, 1993|&#344;eh&#225;nek and Cecca (1993]], p.155), [[&#344;eh&#225;nek, 1985a|&#344;eh&#225;nek (1985a]]) provided an emendation; however, the latter author did not indicate that he was emending <I>Cadosina</I>.&nbsp; Type: not designated; "type species" - <I>[[Cadosina fusca]]</I>.
+
<B><I>CADOSINA</I></B> [[Wanner, 1940]], p.79.&nbsp; Calcareous dinoflagellate genus, originally described as a foraminifer (see [[Elbr&#228;chter et al., 2008]], p.1298).&nbsp; Emendation: [[Masters and Scott, 1978]], p.220.&nbsp; Taxonomic senior synonym: <I>[[Stomiosphaera]]</I>, according to [[Bonet, 1956|Bonet (1956]], p.447&ndash;448 &mdash; however, [[I. Nagy, 1966|I. Nagy (1966]], p.87) proposed the retention of <I>Cadosina</I>.&nbsp; Taxonomic junior synonyms: <I>[[Hemistomiosphaera]]</I>, according to [[&#344;eh&#225;nek and Cecca, 1993|&#344;eh&#225;nek and Cecca (1993]], p.155); <I>[[Obliquipithonella]]</I>, according to [[Reh&#225;kov&#225; and Michal&#237;k, 1996|Reh&#225;kov&#225; and Michal&#237;k (1996]], p.93) &mdash; however, <I>[[Obliquipithonella]]</I> is now considered a taxonomic junior synonym of <I>[[Pirumella]]</I>.&nbsp; [[Fensome and Williams, 2004|Fensome and Williams (2004]]) considered this genus to be not validly published because a type was not designated.&nbsp; However, [[Elbr&#228;chter et al., 2008|Elbr&#228;chter et al. (2008]], p.1298) implied that this generic name can be considered validly published as it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N.&nbsp; Thus, we have revised the status of the contained species as appropriate, as well as reconsidered the generic synonymies.&nbsp; According to [[&#344;eh&#225;nek and Cecca, 1993|&#344;eh&#225;nek and Cecca (1993]], p.155), [[&#344;eh&#225;nek, 1985a|&#344;eh&#225;nek (1985a]]) provided an emendation; however, the latter author did not indicate that he was emending <I>Cadosina</I>.&nbsp; Type: not designated; "type species" &mdash; <I>[[Cadosina fusca]]</I>.
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
  

Latest revision as of 19:06, 21 December 2016

CADOSINA Wanner, 1940, p.79.  Calcareous dinoflagellate genus, originally described as a foraminifer (see Elbrächter et al., 2008, p.1298).  Emendation: Masters and Scott, 1978, p.220.  Taxonomic senior synonym: Stomiosphaera, according to Bonet (1956, p.447–448 — however, I. Nagy (1966, p.87) proposed the retention of Cadosina.  Taxonomic junior synonyms: Hemistomiosphaera, according to Řehánek and Cecca (1993, p.155); Obliquipithonella, according to Reháková and Michalík (1996, p.93) — however, Obliquipithonella is now considered a taxonomic junior synonym of PirumellaFensome and Williams (2004) considered this genus to be not validly published because a type was not designated.  However, Elbrächter et al. (2008, p.1298) implied that this generic name can be considered validly published as it was proposed under the I.C.Z.N.  Thus, we have revised the status of the contained species as appropriate, as well as reconsidered the generic synonymies.  According to Řehánek and Cecca (1993, p.155), Řehánek (1985a) provided an emendation; however, the latter author did not indicate that he was emending Cadosina.  Type: not designated; "type species" — Cadosina fusca.

Parent: Subfamily Calciodinelloideae

Species List: