Difference between revisions of "Cannosphaeropsis utinensis"
From dinoflaj3
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <nowiki>*</nowiki><B><I>utinensis</I></B> [[Wetzel, 1933b]], p.6, pl.3, figs.9 | + | <nowiki>*</nowiki><B><I>utinensis</I></B> [[Wetzel, 1933b]], p.6, pl.3, figs.9–17; text-fig.12. Emendations: [[May, 1980]], p.45; [[Duxbury, 1980]], p.114–115; [[Sarjeant, 1985b]], p.147–149; [[Marheinecke, 1992]], p.41–42. Holotype: [[Wetzel, 1933b]], pl.3, figs.9a–b; lost according to [[Sarjeant, 1985b|Sarjeant (1985b]], p.148). Lectotype: [[Wetzel, 1933b]], pl.3, fig.11; [[Sarjeant, 1985b]], pl.5, figs.1–2; [[Dietz et al., 1999]], fig.10, no.7; designated by [[Sarjeant, 1985b|Sarjeant (1985b]], p.148). This name was not validly published in [[Wetzel, 1932|Wetzel (1932]], p.140) since it was merely used in anticipation of future acceptance of the name (I.C.N. Article 36.1). This interpretation is in contrast to that of [[Lentin and Williams, 1993|Lentin and Williams (1993]], p.80). Age: Late Cretaceous. |
[[Category:Index2016]] | [[Category:Index2016]] | ||
| + | [[Category:HasImage]] | ||
| − | <BR><CENTER>[[Image:Cannosphaeropsis_utinensis.jpg]]</CENTER> | + | <BR><CENTER>[[Image:Cannosphaeropsis_utinensis.jpg|link=]]</CENTER> |
[[Category:Taxon]] | [[Category:Taxon]] | ||
[[Category:Species|utinensis Cannosphaeropsis]] | [[Category:Species|utinensis Cannosphaeropsis]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:16, 30 December 2016
*utinensis Wetzel, 1933b, p.6, pl.3, figs.9–17; text-fig.12. Emendations: May, 1980, p.45; Duxbury, 1980, p.114–115; Sarjeant, 1985b, p.147–149; Marheinecke, 1992, p.41–42. Holotype: Wetzel, 1933b, pl.3, figs.9a–b; lost according to Sarjeant (1985b, p.148). Lectotype: Wetzel, 1933b, pl.3, fig.11; Sarjeant, 1985b, pl.5, figs.1–2; Dietz et al., 1999, fig.10, no.7; designated by Sarjeant (1985b, p.148). This name was not validly published in Wetzel (1932, p.140) since it was merely used in anticipation of future acceptance of the name (I.C.N. Article 36.1). This interpretation is in contrast to that of Lentin and Williams (1993, p.80). Age: Late Cretaceous.
Infrataxon List: