Difference between revisions of "Ceriocysta intermedia"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
"<B><I>intermedia</I></B>" [[Xu Jinli et al., 1997]], p.51, pl.1, figs.5a-b,6; pl.2, fig.3; pl.46, figs.5a-b; pl.47, figs.2a-b,3a-c.&nbsp; <B>Name not validly published:</B> holotype not designated.&nbsp; The holotype was not designated in [[Xu Jinli et al., 1997|Xu Jinli et al. (1997]]), nor did these authors provide a Latin or English description.&nbsp; [[He Chengquan et al., 2009|He Chengquan et al. (2009]], p.651) provided an English description, but effectively did not designate a holotype: they referred to the measurements of the holotype but do not clearly indicate the figure in which it is illustrated, and thus according to I.C.N. Article 43.3, this name remains not validly published.&nbsp; Age: Mid-Late Eocene.
+
"<B><I>intermedia</I></B>" [[Xu Jinli et al., 1997]], p.51, pl.1, figs.5a&ndash;b,6; pl.2, fig.3; pl.46, figs.5a&ndash;b; pl.47, figs.2a&ndash;b,3a&ndash;c.&nbsp; <B>Name not validly published:</B> holotype not designated.&nbsp; The holotype was not designated in [[Xu Jinli et al., 1997|Xu Jinli et al. (1997]]), nor did these authors provide a Latin or English description.&nbsp; [[He Chengquan et al., 2009|He Chengquan et al. (2009]], p.651) provided an English description, but effectively did not designate a holotype: they referred to the measurements of the holotype but do not clearly indicate the figure in which it is illustrated, and thus according to I.C.N. Article 43.3, this name remains not validly published.&nbsp; Age: middle-late Eocene.
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
 
[[Category:Index2016]]
  

Latest revision as of 19:08, 21 December 2016

"intermedia" Xu Jinli et al., 1997, p.51, pl.1, figs.5a–b,6; pl.2, fig.3; pl.46, figs.5a–b; pl.47, figs.2a–b,3a–c.  Name not validly published: holotype not designated.  The holotype was not designated in Xu Jinli et al. (1997), nor did these authors provide a Latin or English description.  He Chengquan et al. (2009, p.651) provided an English description, but effectively did not designate a holotype: they referred to the measurements of the holotype but do not clearly indicate the figure in which it is illustrated, and thus according to I.C.N. Article 43.3, this name remains not validly published.  Age: middle-late Eocene.

Parent: Ceriocysta