Difference between revisions of "Cleistosphaeridium lumectum"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "?<I><B>lumectum</B></I>" ([[Sarjeant, 1960a]], p.139 | + | "?<I><B>lumectum</B></I>" ([[Sarjeant, 1960a]], p.139–140, pl.6, fig.1; text-fig.2) [[Davey et al., 1969]], p.16. Holotype: [[Sarjeant, 1960a]], pl.6, fig.1; text-fig.2. <B>NOW</B> <I>[[Impletosphaeridium lumectum|Impletosphaeridium]]</I>. Originally <I>[[Baltisphaeridium lumectum Appendix A|Baltisphaeridium]]</I> (Appendix A), subsequently <I>Cleistosphaeridium</I>, thirdly <I>Cleistosphaeridium</I>?, fourthly (and now) <I>[[Impletosphaeridium lumectum|Impletosphaeridium]]</I>. Questionable assignment: [[Stover and Evitt, 1978|Stover and Evitt (1978]], p.32) as a problematic species. This combination was not validly published in [[Davey et al., 1966|Davey et al. (1966]], p.170), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: late Oxfordian. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:10, 21 December 2016
"?lumectum" (Sarjeant, 1960a, p.139–140, pl.6, fig.1; text-fig.2) Davey et al., 1969, p.16. Holotype: Sarjeant, 1960a, pl.6, fig.1; text-fig.2. NOW Impletosphaeridium. Originally Baltisphaeridium (Appendix A), subsequently Cleistosphaeridium, thirdly Cleistosphaeridium?, fourthly (and now) Impletosphaeridium. Questionable assignment: Stover and Evitt (1978, p.32) as a problematic species. This combination was not validly published in Davey et al. (1966, p.170), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: late Oxfordian.
Parent: Cleistosphaeridium