Difference between revisions of "Hystrichodinium dasum"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ?<B><I>dasum</I></B> [[Davey, 1969a]], p.175 | + | ?<B><I>dasum</I></B> [[Davey, 1969a]], p.175–176, pl.10, figs.8–9. Holotype: [[Davey, 1969a]], pl.10, fig.8. Originally <I>Hystrichodinium</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Hystrichodinium</I>?. Questionable assignment: [[Stover and Evitt, 1978|Stover and Evitt (1978]], p.162). Principle 5 of the I.C.N. states that "... names of taxonomic groups are treated as Latin regardless of their origin." Thus, the epithet "<I>dasys</I>" should be Latinized to "<I>dasus</I>", with the neuter form being "<I>dasum</I>". Age: Cenomanian. |
[[Category:Index2016]] | [[Category:Index2016]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:24, 21 December 2016
?dasum Davey, 1969a, p.175–176, pl.10, figs.8–9. Holotype: Davey, 1969a, pl.10, fig.8. Originally Hystrichodinium, subsequently (and now) Hystrichodinium?. Questionable assignment: Stover and Evitt (1978, p.162). Principle 5 of the I.C.N. states that "... names of taxonomic groups are treated as Latin regardless of their origin." Thus, the epithet "dasys" should be Latinized to "dasus", with the neuter form being "dasum". Age: Cenomanian.
Parent: Hystrichodinium