Difference between revisions of "Imperfectodinium septatum"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
"<I><B>septatum</B></I>" Zevenboom and Santarelli in [[Zevenboom, 1995]], p.148, pl.6, figs.5-10.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Zevenboom, 1995]], pl.6, figs.5-7..&nbsp; <B>Name not validly published</B>: considered a manuscript name.&nbsp; This name was also not validly published in [[Gedl, 1996|Gedl (1996]], p.198), since no description was provided.&nbsp; Age: latest Early Miocene-earliest Late Miocene.
+
"<I><B>septatum</B></I>" Zevenboom and Santarelli in [[Zevenboom, 1995]], p.148, pl.6, figs.5&ndash;10.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Zevenboom, 1995]], pl.6, figs.5&ndash;7..&nbsp; <B>Name not validly published</B>: considered a manuscript name.&nbsp; This name was also not validly published in [[Gedl, 1996|Gedl (1996]], p.198), since no description was provided.&nbsp; Age: latest early Miocene&ndash;earliest late Miocene.
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
  

Latest revision as of 19:29, 21 December 2016

"septatum" Zevenboom and Santarelli in Zevenboom, 1995, p.148, pl.6, figs.5–10.  Holotype: Zevenboom, 1995, pl.6, figs.5–7..  Name not validly published: considered a manuscript name.  This name was also not validly published in Gedl (1996, p.198), since no description was provided.  Age: latest early Miocene–earliest late Miocene.

Parent: Imperfectodinium