Difference between revisions of "Inocardion pseudoconoideum"
From dinoflaj3
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <B><I>pseudoconoideum</I></B> [[Masters and Scott, 1978]], p.215 | + | <B><I>pseudoconoideum</I></B> [[Masters and Scott, 1978]], p.215–216,218. Holotype: not designated. <I>Inocardion pseudoconoideum</I> was proposed as a "new name" (sensu I.C.Z.N.) by [[Masters and Scott, 1978|Masters and Scott (1978]], p.215) for a form included by [[Villain, 1975|Villain (1975]], p.197–198, pl.4, fig.1; pl.5, figs.2–4; table 15, figs.7–8) as <I>[[Bonetocardiella conoidea]]</I>. As this name was published under the I.C.Z.N., it can be considered validly published and legitimate when brought under the I.C.N. even though no type was designated. Age: ?Cretaceous. |
[[Category:Index2016]] | [[Category:Index2016]] | ||
[[Category:Index2016new]] | [[Category:Index2016new]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:29, 21 December 2016
pseudoconoideum Masters and Scott, 1978, p.215–216,218. Holotype: not designated. Inocardion pseudoconoideum was proposed as a "new name" (sensu I.C.Z.N.) by Masters and Scott (1978, p.215) for a form included by Villain (1975, p.197–198, pl.4, fig.1; pl.5, figs.2–4; table 15, figs.7–8) as Bonetocardiella conoidea. As this name was published under the I.C.Z.N., it can be considered validly published and legitimate when brought under the I.C.N. even though no type was designated. Age: ?Cretaceous.
Parent: Inocardion