Difference between revisions of "Baltisphaeridium hirsutoides Appendix A"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<I><B>hirsutoides</B></I> ([[Eisenack, 1951]], p.189-190, pl.3, fig.8) [[Eisenack, 1959]], p.196.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Eisenack, 1931]], pl.5, fig.19, as "<I>[[Ovum hispidum Appendix A|Ovum hispidum]]</I> cf. <I>hirsutum</I> Ehrenb.", lost according to [[Eisenack et al., 1973|Eisenack et al. (1973]], p.125).&nbsp; Neotype: [[Eisenack, 1951]], pl.3, fig.8, designated by [[Eisenack et al., 1973|Eisenack et al. (1973]], p.125).&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium hirsutoides|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Baltisphaeridium</I>.&nbsp; This combination was not validly published in [[Eisenack, 1958b|Eisenack (1958b]], p.400), since that author did not fully reference the basionym.&nbsp; Age: Late Ordovician.
+
<I><B>hirsutoides</B></I> ([[Eisenack, 1951]], p.189&ndash;190, pl.3, fig.8) [[Eisenack, 1959]], p.196.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Eisenack, 1931]], pl.5, fig.19, as "<I>[[Ovum hispidum Appendix A|Ovum hispidum]]</I> cf. <I>hirsutum</I> Ehrenb.", lost according to [[Eisenack et al., 1973|Eisenack et al. (1973]], p.125).&nbsp; Neotype: [[Eisenack, 1951]], pl.3, fig.8, designated by [[Eisenack et al., 1973|Eisenack et al. (1973]], p.125).&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium hirsutoides|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I>, subsequently (and now) <I>Baltisphaeridium</I>.&nbsp; This combination was not validly published in [[Eisenack, 1958b|Eisenack (1958b]], p.400), since that author did not fully reference the basionym.&nbsp; Age: Late Ordovician.
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
  

Latest revision as of 20:59, 21 December 2016

hirsutoides (Eisenack, 1951, p.189–190, pl.3, fig.8) Eisenack, 1959, p.196.  Holotype: Eisenack, 1931, pl.5, fig.19, as "Ovum hispidum cf. hirsutum Ehrenb.", lost according to Eisenack et al. (1973, p.125).  Neotype: Eisenack, 1951, pl.3, fig.8, designated by Eisenack et al. (1973, p.125).  Originally Hystrichosphaeridium, subsequently (and now) Baltisphaeridium.  This combination was not validly published in Eisenack (1958b, p.400), since that author did not fully reference the basionym.  Age: Late Ordovician.

Parent: Baltisphaeridium_Appendix A

Infrataxon List: