Difference between revisions of "Adnatosphaeridium caulleryi"
From dinoflaj3
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <I><B>caulleryi</B></I> ([[Deflandre, 1939a]], p.189, pl.11, figs.2 | + | <I><B>caulleryi</B></I> ([[Deflandre, 1939a]], p.189, pl.11, figs.2–3) [[Williams and Downie, 1969]], p.17. Emendation: [[Stancliffe and Sarjeant, 1990]], p.200, as <I>Adnatosphaeridium caulleryi</I>. Holotype: [[Deflandre, 1939a]], pl.11, fig.2; [[Stancliffe and Sarjeant, 1990]], pl.1, figs.3,5; [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004]], pl.1, figs.7–8. Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium caulleryi|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I>, subsequently <I>[[Cannosphaeropsis caulleryi|Cannosphaeropsis]]</I>, thirdly (and now) <I>Adnatosphaeridium</I>, fourthly <I>[[Polystephanephorus caulleryi|Polystephanephorus]]</I>. [[Stancliffe and Sarjeant, 1990|Stancliffe and Sarjeant (1990]], p.200) retained this species in <I>Adnatosphaeridium</I>. This combination was not validly published in [[Williams and Downie, 1966c|Williams and Downie (1966c]], p.218), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: early Oxfordian. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
| + | [[Category:HasImage]] | ||
<BR><CENTER>[[Image:Adnatosphaeridium_caulleryi.jpg|link=]]</CENTER> | <BR><CENTER>[[Image:Adnatosphaeridium_caulleryi.jpg|link=]]</CENTER> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:10, 30 December 2016
caulleryi (Deflandre, 1939a, p.189, pl.11, figs.2–3) Williams and Downie, 1969, p.17. Emendation: Stancliffe and Sarjeant, 1990, p.200, as Adnatosphaeridium caulleryi. Holotype: Deflandre, 1939a, pl.11, fig.2; Stancliffe and Sarjeant, 1990, pl.1, figs.3,5; Fauconnier and Masure, 2004, pl.1, figs.7–8. Originally Hystrichosphaeridium, subsequently Cannosphaeropsis, thirdly (and now) Adnatosphaeridium, fourthly Polystephanephorus. Stancliffe and Sarjeant (1990, p.200) retained this species in Adnatosphaeridium. This combination was not validly published in Williams and Downie (1966c, p.218), since these authors did not fully reference the basionym. Age: early Oxfordian.
