Difference between revisions of "Surculosphaeridium longifurcatum"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <I><B>longifurcatum</B></I> ([[Firtion, 1952]], p.157 | + | <I><B>longifurcatum</B></I> ([[Firtion, 1952]], p.157–158, pl.9, fig.1; text-figs.1H–M) [[Davey et al., 1966]], p.163. Holotype: [[Firtion, 1952]], pl.9, fig.1; lost according to Fauconnier and Pourtoy in [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004|Fauconnier and Masure (2004]], p.517). Neotype: [[Foucher, 1976]], pl.5, figs.7–8, designated by Fauconnier and Pourtoy in [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004|Fauconnier and Masure (2004]], p.518); [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004]], pl.74, figs.2–3. Originally <I>[[Hystrichosphaeridium longifurcatum|Hystrichosphaeridium]]</I>, subsequently <I>[[Baltisphaeridium longifurcatum Appendix A|Baltisphaeridium]]</I> (Appendix A), thirdly (and now) <I>Surculosphaeridium</I>, fourthly <I>Surculosphaeridium</I>?. Questionable assignment: [[Stover and Evitt, 1978|Stover and Evitt (1978]], p.83) — however, Fauconnier and Pourtoy in [[Fauconnier and Masure, 2004|Fauconnier and Masure (2004]], p.517) considered that this species should be assigned to <I>Surculosphaeridium</I> without question.. Age: Cenomanian. |
[[Category:Index2004]] | [[Category:Index2004]] | ||
| + | [[Category:HasImage]] | ||
<BR><CENTER>[[Image:Surculosphaeridium_longifurcatum.jpg|link=]]</CENTER> | <BR><CENTER>[[Image:Surculosphaeridium_longifurcatum.jpg|link=]]</CENTER> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:58, 30 December 2016
longifurcatum (Firtion, 1952, p.157–158, pl.9, fig.1; text-figs.1H–M) Davey et al., 1966, p.163. Holotype: Firtion, 1952, pl.9, fig.1; lost according to Fauconnier and Pourtoy in Fauconnier and Masure (2004, p.517). Neotype: Foucher, 1976, pl.5, figs.7–8, designated by Fauconnier and Pourtoy in Fauconnier and Masure (2004, p.518); Fauconnier and Masure, 2004, pl.74, figs.2–3. Originally Hystrichosphaeridium, subsequently Baltisphaeridium (Appendix A), thirdly (and now) Surculosphaeridium, fourthly Surculosphaeridium?. Questionable assignment: Stover and Evitt (1978, p.83) — however, Fauconnier and Pourtoy in Fauconnier and Masure (2004, p.517) considered that this species should be assigned to Surculosphaeridium without question.. Age: Cenomanian.
