Difference between revisions of "Batiacasphaera spumosa"

From dinoflaj3
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<I><B>spumosa</B></I> ([[Brideaux, 1977]], p.12, pl.3, figs.9-14) [[Below, 1981a]], p.26.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Brideaux, 1977]], pl.3, figs.9,14.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Canningia spumosa|Canningia]]</I>, subsequently <I>Batiacasphaera</I>?, thirdly (and now) <I>Batiacasphaera</I>.&nbsp; Questionable assignment: [[Below, 1981a|Below (1981a]], p.26) - however, [[Kumar, 1986a|Kumar (1986a]], p.32) retained this species in <I>Batiacasphaera</I> without question.&nbsp; [[Helby, 1987|Helby (1987]], p.324-325) also proposed this combination without question.&nbsp; Age: Aptian.
+
<I><B>spumosa</B></I> ([[Brideaux, 1977]], p.12, pl.3, figs.9&ndash;14) [[Below, 1981a]], p.26.&nbsp; Holotype: [[Brideaux, 1977]], pl.3, figs.9,14.&nbsp; Originally <I>[[Canningia spumosa|Canningia]]</I>, subsequently <I>Batiacasphaera</I>?, thirdly (and now) <I>Batiacasphaera</I>.&nbsp; Questionable assignment: [[Below, 1981a|Below (1981a]], p.26) &mdash; however, [[Kumar, 1986a|Kumar (1986a]], p.32) retained this species in <I>Batiacasphaera</I> without question.&nbsp; [[Helby, 1987|Helby (1987]], p.324&ndash;325) also proposed this combination without question.&nbsp; Age: Aptian.
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
 
[[Category:Index2004]]
  
Line 12: Line 12:
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:Type#<nowiki>*</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
 
|?Category:TypeCorrectName#<nowiki>+</nowiki>,  
|limit=200
+
|limit=400
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|format=template | template=SpeciesListNoQuest  
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|?Category:Quoted#",'''
 
|Outro=</div>}}
 
|Outro=</div>}}

Latest revision as of 19:05, 21 December 2016

spumosa (Brideaux, 1977, p.12, pl.3, figs.9–14) Below, 1981a, p.26.  Holotype: Brideaux, 1977, pl.3, figs.9,14.  Originally Canningia, subsequently Batiacasphaera?, thirdly (and now) Batiacasphaera.  Questionable assignment: Below (1981a, p.26) — however, Kumar (1986a, p.32) retained this species in Batiacasphaera without question.  Helby (1987, p.324–325) also proposed this combination without question.  Age: Aptian.

Parent: Batiacasphaera